who is stalos?

[maverixdamighty]

why did sirken offer to ban/suspend skar?

NEXT

[Pikrib]

HB it's time to stop posting,





















and to give me that ES BP you owe me.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why did sirken offer to ban/suspend skar?

NEXT

If he did, it seems incorrect based on the rules posted by Derubael. However, GM's basically have unlimited discretion on P99, so technically nothing he does is ever "incorrect", but it does not jive with the language of this rule:

"In large scale PvP there is no limit to the number of zones a force can be locked out of. If a fight took place across multiple zones the lockout will apply to all zones a PvP related death occurred in."

Please explain to me, based on the posted PNP, why you believe Dango should be protected from PVP.

[Burgerking]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yet Azrael will routinely call a pvp fight a "large scale pvp" if it's 6v1. Also Assault attacking Dango is again irrelevant, proven by rules posted prior. Dreadlands was not an affected zone of the large scale pvp. Thank you, you lose I win, NEXT.

Guild LNS is not restricted by Zone. It's Guild-wide, you are even allowed to bring in healers and clearer's that weren't in the initial pvp fight. This was set as precedent in numerous guild LNS's in the past, like when Holo called LNS in VP previously and Retti was allowed to travel through each zone to reach VP unmolested.

Attacking other members of our guild elsewhere, BEFORE you finish scooting from VP would violate that LNS. As we would be unable to attack your members as any of them can be deemed part of the corpse recovery effort.

But that's all a moot point because you wiped to PVE you had no right to guild LNS period and would have had to have several of your members DIE in a group battle of 7 or more to be able to call LNS. So technically you only had the right to guild LNS after your rez group died.

I thought you were supposed to be good at lawyer-questing because so far I'm not impressed.

[maverixdamighty]

There was fighting that took place in DL. May not have resulted in YT like it did in OT, WC, Skyfire etc but there was fighting prior to VP being contested. Should all of those zones have been "locked out" based on the rules?

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There was fighting that took place in DL. May not have resulted in YT like it did in OT, WC, Skyfire etc but there was fighting prior to VP being contested. Should all of those zones have been "locked out" based on the rules?

In large scale PvP there is no limit to the number of zones a force can be locked out of. If a fight took place across multiple zones the lockout will apply to all zones a PvP related death occurred in.

[lite]

No reason to be salty. This big guild LNS situations cause a lot of confusion and Sirken tried to resolve it as quickly and as best he could, which in the end he did.

He was going to suspende Assault, and in the spirit of not being petty I asked him not to and he changed his decision. Colgate was in the skype call and can confirm.

[lite]

grats stalos and sheriffine on sow swords

[Andis]

still unsure as to why sirken kills azrael before getting the facts

but thats besides the point.

[Burgerking]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In large scale PvP there is no limit to the number of zones a force can be locked out of. If a fight took place across multiple zones the lockout will apply to all zones a PvP related death occurred in.

Are your forgetting the fact that your guild had no right to call guild LNS in the first place until a force of at least 7 took some YT in PvP.

It wasn't until after your rez party died that you even had the right to guild LNS, basically you don't have a leg to stand on.