Netanyahu Raises Political Will for Iran Invasion. Zionist Press:"Iran Rattles Saber"

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Naez 4.20 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

because the UN is the apotheosis of credibility and all

Hey, that's fair. I'm not saying you have to trust them. Like I said earlier, the alternative is that the US government, European governments, Israeli government, United Nations, CIA, SIS, and Mossad are all involved in a conspiracy aimed at unfairly and incorrectly attributing military motives to Iran's nuclear program. If they are, they got me. Baaaaaa.

[Tommy_Wiseau]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You seem invested in this. I'm sorry that you were incorrect. An IAEA report does not = un-sourced. The IAEA is the source. They are a UN-backed international watchdog organization. They don't need to provide evidence.

no

[purest]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The alternative is that the US government, European governments, Israeli government, United Nations, CIA, SIS, and Mossad are all involved in a conspiracy aimed at unfairly and incorrectly attributing military motives to Iran's nuclear program.

[citation needed]

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by purest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[citation needed]

Page back, tiger.

[purest]

Fact: The National Intelligence Estimates of 2007 and 2011 both reaffirmed that no nuclear material is being diverted to military purposes from Iran’s civilian nuclear enrichment facilities. [citation]

Fact: Every IAEA report since Iran began to be monitored is unequivocal in stating that "no diversion of nuclear material (for military purposes) has taken place." [citation]

Fact: 4. The US intelligence establishment doubts that Iran has or wants a nuclear weapons program. [citation]

Fact: Israeli military intelligence has said Iran has no present nuclear weapons program. [citation]

[Daldolma]

Haha, boy -- your list got shorter. I already responded to this shit back when you posted it the first time. I don't care enough to do it again, especially for someone that misunderstands the entire basis of the international concern. The point is that the civilian nuclear program is designed to provide the materials for a nuclear weapons program. Saying they haven't diverted nuclear material to the military yet is worthless. They wouldn't do that. And like I already said, the distinction is insignificant. Their "civilian" nuclear program just moved substantial nuclear material into a military-controlled bunker.

[Ximo]

tldr

[purest]

Originally Posted by NY Times

The agency did not say where the evidence came from, nor did it provide many details about the allegations.

Originally Posted by Daldolma

They do not need to provide evidence.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daldolma]

Haha, I give up. You're right. The IAEA isn't a credible enough source to release a claim in a report without providing evidence. They need to adhere to standard Wikipedia guidelines and provide sources.

[purest]

Originally Posted by Daldolma

They do not need to provide evidence.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]