Impeaching President Trump

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by PieOats [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Under most circumstances, no. However PERJURY is. Was it enormously gay of the Republican Party to impeach the wildly charismatic rrapist William Jefferson Clinton for consensual sexual relations with an intern? On some levels it was.

it's not defined in the document. america is about freedom. run wild y'all.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by KansasComrade [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is a blowjob a misdemeanor or a high crime? Asking for a friend.

I don’t think it’s wise of you to bring this up in 2019. The president was fucking his interns which is a grave abuse of power and he lied under oath which is a felony, yes.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don’t think it’s wise of you to bring this up in 2019. The president was fucking his interns which is a grave abuse of power and he lied under oath which is a felony, yes.

I guess you proved that it's current year and Presidential misconduct is impeachable.

Well done.

[Kaveh]

Originally Posted by Thrombosis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pardon my ignorance here but for impeachment don't you have to have been found to have committed some crime? High crimes and misdemeanours is the phrase right?

This fool might lose the popular vote by an even larger margin than last time but still win in 2020. God damn the Democratic Party is a bunch of feckless losers. Can liberals produce one attractive human being that is sane? For the love of God, these candidates mostly get dunked on by trump across the south and Midwest. I hope I’m wrong, but I think warren or sanders lose to trump soundly in the electoral college

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Kaveh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This fool might lose the popular vote by an even larger margin than last time but still win in 2020. God damn the Democratic Party is a bunch of feckless losers. Can liberals produce one attractive human being that is sane? For the love of God, these candidates mostly get dunked on by trump across the south and Midwest. I hope I’m wrong, but I think warren or sanders lose to trump soundly in the electoral college

I’ll say it for the 1000th time. The establishment play is for Trump to win and to keep him hamstrung. When you understand this, what is seemingly insane before seems to make more sense.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I’ll say it for the 1000th time. The establishment play is for Trump to win and to keep him hamstrung. When you understand this, what is seemingly insane before seems to make more sense.

"The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies. However, they must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy."

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Thrombosis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pardon my ignorance here but for impeachment don't you have to have been found to have committed some crime? High crimes and misdemeanours is the phrase right?

18 U.S. Code § 872: Extortion by officers or employees of the United States.

“Whoever, being an officer, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, or representing himself to be or assuming to act as such, under color or pretense of office or employment commits or attempts an act of extortion, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

[Kaveh]

The founding fathers would have trump drawn and quartered. To be fair, they would’ve done worse to Obama

[Horza]

Sondland recounted how he told Ukrainian officials military aid was tied to their commitment to investigations President Trump wanted.

A critical witness in the impeachment inquiry offered Congress substantial new testimony this week, revealing that he told a top Ukrainian official that the country likely would not receive American military aid unless it publicly committed to investigations President Trump wanted.

The disclosure from Gordon D. Sondland, the United States ambassador to the European Union, in four new pages of sworn testimony released on Tuesday, confirmed his involvement in laying out a quid pro quo to Ukraine that he had previously not acknowledged.

[FatherSioux]

Is Pie Oats the new beer dwarf guy from yore?