Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #771  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:01 PM
paulgiamatti paulgiamatti is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: minneapolis belongs to me
Posts: 2,045
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How does the lung fish become the amphibian? Does it happen all at once? Suddenly in one day the lungfish becomes a fully formed amphibian? Does the lungfish give birth to a new kind of animal, a fully formed amphibian?
Holy facepalm.
  #772  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:04 PM
Glenzig Glenzig is offline
Planar Protector

Glenzig's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Holy facepalm.
Well if there is no transition, how does a lungfish become an amphibian? That isn't a logical follow up question to the statement that there is no transition?
  #773  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:05 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

dear dumb motherfuckers: every fossil is a transitional fossil, you retards
  #774  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:08 PM
KagatobLuvsAnimu KagatobLuvsAnimu is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So how does that happen? Will dogs become cats one day?
You make a claim without proof.

Maybe it was magic.

Abracadabra! Watch as this fish becomes an amphibian! I am the great Darwini!
Cats did not evolve from dogs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Holy facepalm.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #775  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:11 PM
paulgiamatti paulgiamatti is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: minneapolis belongs to me
Posts: 2,045
Default

Stop asking random P99 message boarders to answer your questions about evolutionary biology and go read an actual book. You know, one by an actual evolutionary biologist that provides substantive research based on evidence. It's not just some fancy word we're using to make ourselves seem smart, I promise - there is real, tangible evidence for this stuff. I'm totally serious.
  #776  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:12 PM
leewong leewong is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So how does that happen? Will dogs become cats one day?
You make a claim without proof.

Maybe it was magic.

Abracadabra! Watch as this fish becomes an amphibian! I am the great Darwini!
It has been explained about 50 different ways for you but you still dont get it. Small changes over time. Add up those small changes over a long period of time. Congrats...evolution. Nothing magical or mind blowing about it.
  #777  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:13 PM
leewong leewong is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
dear dumb motherfuckers: every fossil is a transitional fossil, you retards
I already tried explaining that about 10 times.
  #778  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:13 PM
Dior Dior is offline
Aviak

Dior's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 67
Default

I'll also like to throw in that using the "something can't come from nothing" argument essentially means that you don't believe there is a single creator that is the end all. If something can't come from nothing, then where did god(s) come from?

I know this will be ignored because you guys like doing the trolling equivalent to the "Who's On First" routine, but it still needs to be pointed out.
  #779  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:13 PM
RobotElvis RobotElvis is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What part of every fossil we have found is or had the potential to be a transitional fossil did you not understand? You act as if we should find a half duck half alligator but that isnt what evolution posits.
That is exactly what evolution posits. That speciation occurs to the point of new kinds of animals being formed from preceding kinds of animals.

To say that all animals have the potential to be transitional is to deny the proof of theory's around you to the contrary. Consider hybrids.

Hybrids would seem to be nature's most available means of producing new species." Yet the sterility of hybrids defeats that possibility, and rebukes the untruthful claim of the formation of new species. Nature, with sword in hand, decrees the death of hybrids, lest they might produce a new species. Moses wrote the rigid unchanging law of nature, when he said that every living creature would bring forth "after its kind."
Species are immutable. One does not become another, or unite with another to produce a third. Dogs do not become cats, nor interbreed to produce another species. A few species, so nearly related that we can scarcely tell whether they are species or varieties, as the jackass and the mare, may have offspring, but the offspring are sterile. The zebra and the mare may produce a zebulon, which is likewise sterile. And so with the offspring of other groups intermediate between species and varieties. A human being and ape can not beget an ape-human, showing that they are not even nearly related species.

If evolution be true, we would expect a frequent interbreeding and interchanging of species. Even Darwin admitted that species are immutable. God declared it in his word, and stamps it indelibly on every species. "And God said, 'Let the earth bring forth the creature after its kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth, after its kind'."-Gen. 1:24. How did Moses know this great truth, unless he was told by inspiration of God?
Even plant-hybrids are not permanent. Darwin himself says: "But plants not propagated by seed, are of little importance to us, for their endurance is only temporary."
Even if it could be proven that species, like varieties, are formed by development, it does not follow that genera and families and classes are so developed. But it has not been proved that a single species has been added by development, much less orders, families and genera. Evolution must account for every division and sub-division to plant and animal life.
  #780  
Old 09-21-2014, 11:16 PM
paulgiamatti paulgiamatti is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: minneapolis belongs to me
Posts: 2,045
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dior [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'll also like to throw in that using the "something can't come from nothing" argument essentially means that you don't believe there is a single creator that is the end all. If something can't come from nothing, then where did god(s) come from?
I've already pointed this out several times, but I don't blame you for missing it considering the length of the thread. This is also known as the infinite regression argument, and there has never been a meaningful rebuttal to it by any creationist.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.