Arizona election audit finds massive fraud and irregularities

[HalflingSpergand]

Moon landing is completely fake

[Gatordash]

Originally Posted by HalflingSpergand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Moon landing is completely fake

Obviously because there is no wind in space.

[HalflingSpergand]

Many more reasons than just that!

[Nirgon]

Moon landing was real, hate to tell you.

Bring that to the memorial thread in rnf tho.

[HalflingSpergand]

Got proof?

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by HalflingSpergand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Got proof?

Yes there's equipment up there that starts recording on the times they were said to be up there doing it.

I would have to dig all that stuff up again but that's your direction.

Why that isn't more commonly noted is crazy.

The radiation belt and all that shit definitely made me think it wasn't possible, but they did it.

[Gwaihir]

From what I understand the primary mission, once they had accomplished it, was to confirm the theory of recurring Novae.

There were a lot of soil samples taken which contained glass-like material, and scorched-fused solids which indicate the sun has reucurring-Novaed approximately every 12,000 years around the time our geological record indictates a magnetic polar reversal event and subsequent ice age occurred on earth. This also completely changes the geological scale of time required for the breakup of Pangaea, because a major nova would heat the layer beneath the mantle and allow for rapid movement of landmasses across a "more liquid" magma substrate layer. While also messing with our pottassium-argon beta-decay and alpha-decay contemporary radioactive dating methods.

The theory was posited after the discovery of the recurring supernova phenomenon. Basically once a star starts fusing Iron and heavier elements, in order to prevent the death of the star it novas to eject those heavier elements from itself, which is why we have Gold and other heavier elements scattered across the planets of still functioning solar systems.

If this phenomenon weren't the case, gold and elements heavier than iron would be exceedingly rare; nigh impossible to find, in an intact still-functioning solar system since the only mechanism by which it can exist is as an ejection from a star; that is to say, unless out solar system coalesced on top of an already dead super-novaed solar system, we wouldn't have heavy elements in it. Every planet would just be gaseous planets.

[Gatordash]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

From what I understand the primary mission, once they had accomplished it, was to confirm the theory of recurring Novae.

There were a lot of soil samples taken which contained glass-like material, and scorched-fused solids which indicate the sun has reucurring-Novaed approximately every 12,000 years around the time our geological record indictates a magnetic polar reversal event and subsequent ice age occurred on earth. This also completely changes the geological scale of time required for the breakup of Pangaea, because a major nova would heat the layer beneath the mantle and allow for rapid movement of landmasses across a "more liquid" magma substrate layer.

The theory was posited after the discovery of the recurring supernova phenomenon. Basically once a star starts fusing Iron and heavier elements, in order to prevent the death of the star it novas to eject those heavier elements from itself, which is why we have Gold and other heavier elements scattered across the planets of still functioning solar systems.

If this phenomenon weren't the case, gold and elements heavier than iron would be exceedingly rare; nigh impossible to find, in an intact still-functioning solar system since the only mechanism by which it can exist is as an ejection from a star; that is to say, unless out solar system coalesced on top of an already dead super-novaed solar system, we wouldn't have heavy elements in it. Every planet would just be gaseous planets.

Wrong. The world was created 6,000 years ago in just 6 days. Read a Bible for me one time Gwaihir 🙄

[Gwaihir]

This also means, that while "Creationists" may be wrong about the total age of Earth, they are mostly likely correct in their assertion that major geological changes in the past occured over a very short period of time and most of what is observable in their research on the stratification of geological layers in the Grand Canyon and other deep cleft canyons throughout the world is indeed resultant from the Biblical/Gilgamesh Flood myth, and that this timeline corroborates the timeline for the flood myth and destruction of Atlantis posited in Plato's Timaeus and Critias

Furthermore, if you read the description of how each ring of Atlantis was designed, with water channeling through concentric rings of varying metals it's safe to assume they generated electricity using technology similar to "stacks" technology/chemically ionic electron transfer tech, which preceded modern A/C current generating technology which utilizes oscillation of metals through a magnetic field.

[Trexller]

Dang I had always thought the moon landing was done/faked all entirely as a Cold War advertisement to the world:

"If I can build a rocket that flies to the moon, then I can definitely build one that flies to your city"