#71
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Kirban Manaburn / Speedd Haxx
PKer & Master Trainer and Terrorist of Sullon Zek Kills: 1278, Deaths: 76, Killratio: 16.82 | |||
|
#72
|
|||
|
I refuse to believe that our country is not more prepared for a nuclear defense. Our military infrastructure is hardened and I personally think we have surveillance and technology that is still beyond what Russia or anyone else has. Chances are, if Russia decided to take military action, we'd know within seconds. Shit we have a plane orbiting the planet and no one even knows what it's for.
Things have certainly been cut back, and if for no other reason, we should always be cutting edge for appearance purposes, but chances are if we haven't been doing these things visibly, it's because our military is confident in what we have that people like us, quite possibly, have no knowledge of.
__________________
Pro-Rustler since 1974.
| ||
Last edited by R Flair; 11-23-2016 at 01:07 AM..
|
|
#73
|
||||
|
Quote:
I do think there will be a war in the middle-east, and likely nukes used, but that may be projecting a little ahead, and may not involve the US. Depends on wild cards. But it's becoming less probable as Trump gets closer to being sworn in. But that can all change in the twinkling of an eye. I know your view, you disagree with more than a few points [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You'd think they aren't crazy enough to, but I'm sure they are. After all, most of them admire world depopulation anyway. Most of them are expecting some climatic event, a cataclysm. After all, when people like George Soros walks around literally mumbling "I am god", what would you expect the outcome to be? And he's not the only one, by far.
__________________
| |||
Last edited by Daywolf; 11-23-2016 at 01:21 AM..
|
|
#74
|
||||
|
Quote:
Do you know the difference between a modern nuclear attack submarine vs a diesel electric attack submarine? I mean in relation to advantage against a surface target. Which has the clear advantage? What is the difference between our/NATO cruise missile tech compared to theirs? That's another Hitllary answer btw. Thing is, 0bama and HRC gave them a whole mess of tech while HRC was working for 0bama. They literally built them a Silicon Valley, and it's been operational for some time now. Even their ICBM's have been greatly improved for accuracy. Serious, it was a total sell out. I mean prolly to the point that if we had secret tech, they have it now too, and built. But you are saying attack, I'm not looking at attack but defend, which in itself is a very costly and risky tactic.
__________________
| |||
|
#75
|
|||
|
I like go away for many hours to do stuff. And I come back to look at you guys still typing away , I don't know where any of you have the free time to argue so much here.
FYI wall of text I didn't read
__________________
- Trunge - 60 SK <Aftermath>
| ||
|
#76
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#77
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#78
|
|||
|
Here's an update on the doomsday plane thing. This will twist your little noggin. They flew that thing around NORAD just after passing H.R. 5732 at a lame duck session in the House with suspended rules midnight-session vote type thingy, which will put a no-fly zone over Syria. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...ouse-bill/5732
Next step is the senate.
__________________
| ||
|
#79
|
|||
|
good thing daywolf's intel will affect literally nothing
| ||
|
#80
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
|