![]() |
|
#71
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Last edited by rebeccablack; 05-06-2014 at 01:59 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#72
|
|||
|
Or maybe... You should only loot things you killed with your group or your guild. You shouldn't loot something killed by someone else's guild when you weren't invited or weren't told you may loot the mob they killed.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#73
|
|||
|
but the fact is that the same moral integrity you force upon the individual, Daldaen, you are neglecting when it comes to the guild / group.
the group here was not invited by the initial camper of the mob to take the kill. if you want to argue that the group showed up with a force capable of killing the mob first, then you automatically submit to the argument that the looter of the corpse showed up to the open corpse first. there cannot be two separate distinction of morals here. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#74
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is why Prisila being in the kill group doesn't matter. If BDA decided to let the corpse rot or record themselves deleting the item and send the video to Saraya telling her "lol you'll never get your epic" they would be within their rights to do so. Supreme asshole move? Sure, but since it's THEIR kill, it's THEIR loot and if one of their lvl 1 chanter alt was logging on to loot the item, it would also be in their right to do so. The corpse was never "open" because soon as the mob was dead, they decided to award the item to Prisila. Saraya decided to ninja it. I know it sucks that Saraya is an underdog valiantly struggling against a giant like BDA with numbers, mobility and gear, but rules of ownership applies to everyone, from the casual gamer to the most powerful guild on the server. Anyone calling a grey area on this issue makes an emotional judgement. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#75
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Last edited by deadlycupcakez; 05-06-2014 at 02:30 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#76
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
That which does not kill me, should run.
Sylexis Vhaerun - 60 Dark Elf Warrior Silvereyes Niteprowler - 55 Half Elf Druid <Divinity> | |||
|
|
||||
|
#77
|
||||
|
Quote:
You assume that once the mob is dead, the first one that gets to loot can claim the item. That's not how it works. When someone or a group kills a mob, all loot on it becomes their propriety and they can dispose of it as they see fit. Letting rot, deleting everything on it, logging an alt to come loot it or waiting for the loot timer to open so that someone outside the kill group, who was awarded the item, can loot it. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#78
|
|||
|
Who is Erydan? I think I'm in love.
EDIT: Can you imagine the shitstorm if TMO and IB were ninja-ing gear from each others kills while loot is being divided? Would be havoc [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|
|||
|
#79
|
|||
|
Erydan is right, guys. This isn't Sullon Zek.
__________________
“Smile, breathe, and go slowly.”
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#80
|
|||
|
how is that fallacious?
the first one that gets to loot CAN claim the item, that is why the group that gets kill credit has 2 solid minutes to determine who in their group wants it. once the corpse opens up, anyone on the server can loot the corpse. you do not need to receive /consent from the kill credit holders in order to loot the corpse. if it was intended that way, it would have been designed that way. and yes, it would be havoc between the two guilds. however saraya was not in a guild, playing a role on a roleplaying game and therefore does not need to abide by any guild standards. I will be redundant and repeat that the ruling made my the staff is INCORRECT and INVALID. this same concept is relevant to logging off or switching to an alt. | ||
|
Last edited by deadlycupcakez; 05-06-2014 at 02:46 PM..
|
|
||
![]() |
|
|