France Asserts Women's Right to Wear Clothes

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Regarding more restrictive clothing restrictions for women, there are differences between genders. They aren't equal. The dynamics between the genders is not symmetric, so it's unreasonable to assume expectations should necessarily be equivalent for both genders.

Yes and right or wrong, such restrictions are sensible.

Regarding the burkinis, bring incompatible cultures together, and those cultures clash. When a people with an incompatible culture enter proximity of another culture and refuse to assimilate, don't be surprised when there is war. Diversity + proximity = war

Why the bans were sensible, whether right or wrong.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I read about an example but cant find ref atm... it was "Feinstein's Bus" iirc... bunch of smells and sights and sounds that might be annoying, but u can always get off the bus and catch the next one...


yea fash the "dam kids, get off my lawn" adds a nice twist.

Yep, freedom of association, or dissociation ^^ If I don't like what others are doing I can go some place else. If others don't like what I am doing I probably will go someace else. Everyone should be like me in this regard ^^

[fash]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's start with why your example is libertarian and then see if we can develop that into restrictions in clothing ^^

Are you asking for a scenario in which clothing restrictions would arise in a libertarian society? Suppose the property owners in the local community hold similar mores about how people should dress. If you're on their property and don't observe said dress code, you're physically removed.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you asking for a scenario in which clothing restrictions would arise in a libertarian society? Suppose the property owners in the local community hold similar mores about how people should dress. If you're on their property and don't observe said dress code, you're physically removed.

This is my point ^^ You're just being contrarian now, unless you want to argue that everything within a libertarian society is private property ^^

[entruil]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

everything within a libertarian society is private property

just about is

[fash]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is my point ^^ You're just being contrarian now, unless you want to argue that everything within a libertarian society is private property ^^

?? I was trying to makes heads or tails of your question/statement:

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's start with why your example is libertarian and then see if we can develop that into restrictions in clothing ^^

Not sure where you are trying to take the conversation with this. My point was that your characterization of any restriction as anti-libertarianism isn't accurate.

[entruil]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ITT: fat nerds/sperglords/creeps ignore the institution of the beach and what the beach is about.

We aren't going to change the institution of the beach just because some fat arab virgin losers said so.

lol... people of the "beach" guess i missed it... are they made in china there too?... meh gunna hit send...

i bet $$ fat virgin losers would change your institution real f'n quikc lmao... unless they are wearing suits ? ;P ...

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol... people of the "beach" guess i missed it... are they made in china there too?... meh gunna hit send...

i bet $$ fat virgin losers would change your institution real f'n quikc lmao... unless they are wearing suits ? ;P ...

Suits on the beach are acceptable as long as they are seasonal and dressed down/relaxed.

I think everyone can see that suits wouldn't inherently be a bad thing so no idea what your point is there.

[entruil]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Suits on the beach are acceptable as long as they are seasonal and dressed down/relaxed.

I think everyone can see that suits wouldn't inherently be a bad thing so no idea what your point is there.

suits was in ref to your shirt vs suits paradigm....


plus other stuff u didnt pull so ill just b buzzed in the corner for future silence...

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

suits was in ref to your shirt vs suits paradigm....


plus other stuff u didnt pull so ill just b buzzed in the corner for future silence...

Ahh yes I remember.

I use the t-shirt paradigm a lot, I could write a decent blog entry on it I should polish up the thoughts a bit and provide illustrations/backdrop/history to the whole t-shirts versus suits situation 1950 to date.

I probably have about 10-15 odd posts ive made that are certifiably blog worthy. I might utilize the search engine and pull the raw material (also will borrow a few lines and illustrations from big J, uncredited of course since this is America u kno how we do it when we do it bruh)