Why are most of the artists in the USA democrats?

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So the absolute best example you could possibly give that modern feminism has jumped the shark is that some people (all but one of whom broke the law) got fired? Kevin Spacey didn't even have anything to do with women, he groped men! And that autistic Google employee publicly said things guaranteed to alienate a good chunk of his co-workers: if I wrote on my blog that black people were inferior and my boss read it I'd probably get fired from my job too.

So yeah, I have a really hard time seeing feminists as this massive evil powerful organization. And a few terrible people losing their jobs doesn't exactly get me there either.

yes if you do not fit the puritanical construct created by libtards (that they excuse democrat politicians for) then you are blacklisted from mainstream society.

Also millions of people are afraid to speak their opinion out of fear of being hit by a militerized libtard who thinks theyre punching nazi's.

[mickmoranis]

no one. should ever. lose their job. for any violating any shortsighted social construct.

LCK had every right to wip his dick out infront of those women, as does anyone else who invites someone into their private property

[Elrood]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hitler and bush are both excelent painters.

The right just realizes that you can be both an artist AND a contributing member of society at the same time.

/thread

I'm pretty sure Hitler tried to get into art school and wasn't accepted because he was not nearly good enough. I've seen one of his paintings. It was not "excelent."

Bush is a portrait painter. He's not bad, but it's basically carnival-level stuff that you'd pay $25 to have done.

Also, didn't Bush only begin painting after his retirement? Did Hitler continue to paint while leading his nation? I'm not sure if these two are the best examples of being "both an artist AND a contributing member of society at the same time."

[mickmoranis]

both of them (par for the course for superior conservatives) saw that they needed to devote their life to social work instead of prancing around like a child of the state painting pictures.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

militerized libtard



militerized libtard




militerized libtard




militerized libtard

is it cultural appropriation if i add this to my lexicon?

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

is it cultural appropriation if i add this to my lexicon?

yes, my favorite person.

i love love LOVE cultural appropriation the way that kid likes sci fi in the show freaks and geeks.

I also believe no culture owns anyone's appreciation for it and or desire to partake in it, so much so that I believe if you wanted to tan and identify as a black woman it is absolutely your right to celebrate a culture you love.

Anyone who is against cultural appropriation, of any type, is a hard and fast racist.

[skarlorn]

Mickmoranis: Posts gibberish

CHeck and MATE

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no one. should ever. lose their job. for any violating any shortsighted social construct.

LCK had every right to wip his dick out infront of those women, as does anyone else who invites someone into their private property

Yes, but people also have the right to make fun of him for it, call him a creep and cancel his movie deal.

He'll make it -- he's just on time out. He's probably going to do a whole damn stand up routine about this.

[mickmoranis]

Libtards: You can be 1 of a thousand genders, despite your genitalia, but you cannot be a black person if you are not a black skinned person (and all blacks are actually called Africans and Americans, despite where they are from)

[loramin]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no one. should ever. lose their job. for any violating any shortsighted social construct.

LCK had every right to wip his dick out infront of those women, as does anyone else who invites someone into their private property

Ummm ... if you tell your boss (or even just one of your co-workers) to go fuck himself, that's a "shortsighted social construct", but you still get fired. You have a right to free speech, but your boss also has a right to decide who he wants to employ based on that speech. That Google engineer basically wrote a giant fuck you to a good percentage of his company, and the result was as you'd expect.

Same thing for LCK. I will fight to the death to defend every American's God-given right to pull down their pants and masturbate ... but just as with free speech, that right has limits. Your right to expose your genitals ends with others' right not to have to see your genitals.

Even taking your ... generous view of LCK's actions, what he did was no different than a guy in a trenchcoat going up to people in park ... only LCK did it not to complete strangers, but to people you'd think he would have cared about.