![]() |
|
#71
|
|||
|
Flappy Paddles are classic.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#72
|
|||
|
The worst thing about using these things is missing the granular efficiency when it's gone.
Get used to spell sets. They go away. You regret not having 6 perfectly crafted preloaded spellsets Get used to permanent compass. It goes away. You regret having to hit sense heading now. | ||
|
Last edited by Gustoo; 10-18-2019 at 04:30 PM..
|
|
||
|
#73
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#75
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#76
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#77
|
|||
|
Calling something that has been confirmed (currerntly) as GTG is just sounds so incredibly stupid and dishonest.
It isn't cheating. I know you want very, very badly for it to be considered cheating, but it isn't. I can see it's a very personal issue for some of you, so much that you're willing to just say anything and everything you can regardless if it's true or not to get what you want. Here's some info for you. You know all those evil "third party programs" like MQ/SEQ/etc that are banned here and considered cheating? There are servers out there that allow you to use those programs by name. Using those programs on those servers that allow it are not cheating. GINA on P99 is no different, even if the devs don't personally like it, at least they have the dignity to not be a bag of dicks about it like some of you. The same applies here. On high has confirmed GINA is not currently against the rules. Calling people cheaters for using a legal program is nothing but trolling and shit stirring by people who are incapable of approaching a subject they do not like with honesty or integrity. Even if part of me could actually get on board with finding some non-intrusive way to get rid of GINA, I'd still find you dishonest idiots fucking abhorrent. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#78
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#79
|
||||
|
Quote:
Some trolls here on the forums got me to thinking about how many advantages players have now compared to back then. Some of the trolls want to troll harder and suggest needing the CRT monitors (the really good ones are still nice) and using 56K dialup. Some things are not practical. People have argued that because RogerWilco released in 1999 that voice chat should be allowed. Some have argued that even though it was out that it really wasn't all that usable. This is a thought exercise. People like crutches. People have argued because some parsers that could check DPS (I never heard of one check loot logs etc.. i wonder if original developers ever commented on that) that later programs like GINA that display an overlay in real time are ok. Here we are saying its lame. Thought exercise. Does it bother me in my game? Nope. But I am aware other people are out there playing the same game with additional *useless* information. We are not playing the same game. Maybe you are getting a heads up about something whereas I am keeping a mental track of it subject to human failure. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#80
|
|||
|
Most of the same arguments supporting "gina" could be applied to things like packet sniffers that don't directly interact with the client. But that's nothing new....terrible players have always tended to make any mental gymnastics needed to justify their use of training wheels. They're terrified of the notion of having a level playing field because they know, deep down, they can't hack it.
Danth | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|