Strict Gun Laws Will Eliminate Mass Shootings (Japan Version)

[Castle2.0]

"Your argument is so thin, I am not going to waste any time addressing it. I mean, I could totally defeat it in one sentence. However, I would rather take 3 sentences to explain why I won't waste my time..."

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by peterpal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you're already comparing consumer products and cars with guns instead of killing instruments, why not have a gun school and a test as requirement like you have for cars?
Why are shotguns available for 18 year olds and they're allowed to drink at 21?

You guys are too funny trying to interpret Thomas Jefferson's tea leaves to decide what's good for today's society

The reason for this is historical. The majority of states are against gun registries. If you had to take a test and receive a license, that is basically a gun registry at that point. The government would have a list of every person who owns a gun, or who is thinking about owning a gun because they received a license.

The reason why gun registries are bad is because the government NOT knowing who has guns is a security measure against tyranny.

The Supreme Court also ruled against New York's hand gun public carry licensing law, so I doubt you will see any Gun tests/licensing in the near future.

[Rethalis]

The same people that promote gender ideology in kids and adults as some normal healthy and sane thing that totally abides by natural law also wants to remove guns from totally sane normal people who live within natural law.

[Rethalis]

Originally Posted by peterpal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you're already comparing consumer products and cars with guns instead of killing instruments, why not have a gun school and a test as requirement like you have for cars?
Why are shotguns available for 18 year olds and they're allowed to drink at 21?

You guys are too funny trying to interpret Thomas Jefferson's tea leaves to decide what's good for today's society

Reducing the greatest human document in history to "tea leaves" is pretty dumb.

[Jibartik]

"Shall not be infringed"
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

*checks notes
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"hmm I think this means well regulated!"
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Castle2.0]

This convo ended when I brought up wine, cigs, and personal cars.

"But many people find utility and enjoyment in those things."

"But I am responsible."

Guess you just don't care about all those dead people.

Get dunked on. You have no answer.

[Mblake1981]

No constitution, there is no debate to start with.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Jefferson didn't write The Constitution or The Bill of Rights

Hope that helps

Jefferson was an anti-federalist tho. Loved the frogs.

Therefore you are a confederate and I can throw rotten fruit at you online.

[Castle2.0]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Jefferson was an anti-federalist tho. Loved the frogs.

Therefore you are a confederate and I can throw rotten fruit at you online.

But when liquor, cigs and personal car ban to protect all the peoples?

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But when liquor, cigs and personal car ban to protect all the peoples?

I think unless you live in Kansas anymore, you're the subject of a unitary state so /shrug