Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Remember when I said "solipsism"?

Case in point. Of course a troll calls others trolls when they're onto him.

The troll is the person who says "I am right and you are wrong, and I don't need to provide evidence".

That is you, and your post history proves it[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] 0 posts showing any data to counter mine. But keep telling yourself that calling other people autistic or a solipsist is "evidence"[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't even say autism in this one

Making progress! You still average saying "autistic" or "autism" for 1 of every 3 posts for the last 100. Please keep working at it, and start providing evidence for your claims too. I fully believe in your ability to recover. That isn't sarcasm. Everybody can change if they want to.

[Gloomlord]

But that's what you're doing....?

Come on, guys! He's barely disguising it now!

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But that's what you're doing....?

Come on, guys! He's barely disguising it now!

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638

Video and log evidence, where the log evidence can be cross referenced to the videos to prove it hasn't been tampered with.

Troxx has a screenshot of parser data he claims is broken, and we can't prove the screenshot is even real.

You have literally nothing.

Ball is in your court[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638

Video and log evidence, where the log evidence can be cross referenced to the videos to prove it hasn't been tampered with.

Troxx has a screenshot of a parser he claims is broken, and we can't prove the screenshot is even real.

You have literally nothing.

Ball is in your court[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gratz on 100 pages you beautiful clown

[Gloomlord]

He's not a clown -- he's the entire circus.

[Toxigen]

well its monday and you boys got it done, bravo

100 pages of useless bullshit

[Troxx]

Page 100!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Page 100!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Up to page 100 and nothing noteworthy new other than … damn 100 pages. It may be a while before further recaps. Iirc Gloomlord arrives fully and the back and forth goes on for …. well … a long time.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Riddle me this? If the OP had stipulated that no pockets are allowed - would that change your answer? Or would you still drop the cleric?

It’s a simple question that deserves a simple question. Care to answer?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Up to page 100 and nothing noteworthy new other than … damn 100 pages. It may be a while before further recaps. Iirc Gloomlord arrives fully and the back and forth goes on for …. well … a long time.

Troxx dodged the question on pocket characters again. He has yet to tell us where this restriction of no pocket clerics came from. I can answer his question when he answers mine. He always does this, where he deflects with another question.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where did this restriction come from? You are just claiming this is the case without evidence. This is the question you keep dodging.

1. OP did not say they were prohibited.
2. Pocket clerics are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster group", and stop using mules and pocket clerics when they've already used them in the past?

[Ripqozko]

Congrats on 100