Trump! The Neo what?

[Daywolf]

But they mentioned the BLM before the attack. The guy was just minding his own business. This is a hateful attack, based on race alone, because the guy has a different pigmentation than them. But of course not just that, but ideology, racism as it's called. They were "racists", how can this fact be traversed around? Just post a meme, K? IRYD?

Racist for pointing out racism. k... :/
And yeah, I'd say BLM is no different than the KKK, both are wrong. It's just the KKK is content to just rather think and speak now, while the BLM is out there terrorizing Amaricans with violence.

See this is where you and FP could have really gotten into things, almost like two sides of the same coin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm saying "almost", rather than saying it directly, leaving a level of latitude to not be apparently so, either of you.

[Pokesan]

Please examine the context of your earlier comment before authoring another severely stupid post, Kagatob.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please examine the context of your earlier comment before authoring another severely stupid post, Kagatob.

IRYD implied that a non-violent hate group was leaps and bounds worse than a violent hate group. I disagreed. While both groups are despicable, I'd take the non violent hate group over the violent one any day of the week given the choice.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

IRYD implied that a non-violent hate group was leaps and bounds worse than a violent hate group. I disagreed. While both groups are despicable, I'd take the non violent hate group over the violent one any day of the week given the choice.

I'm aware of what you meant but you still spoke up for the KKK my friend!

Own it.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm aware of what you meant but you still spoke up for the KKK my friend!

Own it.

I speak up for the facts, nuances and context regardless of the subject.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

IRYD implied that a non-violent hate group was leaps and bounds worse than a violent hate group. I disagreed. While both groups are despicable, I'd take the non violent hate group over the violent one any day of the week given the choice.

You know what kaga, fuck off.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know what kaga, fuck off.

[Pokesan]

Okay.

Would you object to BLACK LIVES MATTER, TOO ?

Because that's the meaning of the slogan.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay.

Would you object to BLACK LIVES MATTER, TOO ?

Because that's the meaning of the slogan.

I understand that and that is the point of what I said. Everybody agrees with that. Nobody has said otherwise, so why perpetuate the idea that people think they don't.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay.

Would you object to BLACK LIVES MATTER, TOO ?

Because that's the meaning of the slogan.

That may have been the original spirit behind the roots of the movement though honestly considering the less than reputable financial sources of it all its best to remain skeptical of even that.

As it devolved into the hate group that we are all acquainted with now, if what you say is true, there wouldn't be such vehement objection to the reply "all lives matter".