US doomsday plane

[Csihar]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We have our non fat diet that keeps us alive longer

Fat is essential and very healthy. That's why for example avocado, nuts and seeds are very healthy to eat. Even saturated fats are probably not as bad for us as previously thought.

I think the whole 'non-fat' thing is partially ignorance and partially something the food industry came up with. "Fat makes ya fat!". Although the real culprit is sugar. Take out fat and you decrease calories. Take out sugar and you alter the taste significantly to the point where a lot of people won't buy it anymore.

You should look into fat, seriously.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Csihar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fat is essential and very healthy. That's why for example avocado, nuts and seeds are very healthy to eat. Even saturated fats are probably not as bad for us as previously thought.

I think the whole 'non-fat' thing is partially ignorance and partially something the food industry came up with. "Fat makes ya fat!". Although the real culprit is sugar. Take out fat and you decrease calories. Take out sugar and you alter the taste significantly to the point where a lot of people won't buy it anymore.

You should look into fat, seriously.

Yeppers^^ A number of pioneering anti-sat-fat health studies were funded by Proctor & Gamble to promote their healthy alternative, Crisco! containing trans-fat which has now been banned by the US FDA...

Even cholesterol is needed. It's how our bodies make a lot of hormones ^^

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Have a link with the actual text of the bill?

wh wh what do ya mean? Did I link a fake site with fake news? ^^
You must be new to the site [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You just click on the tab-link where it reads "Text". That's between summery and actions below the tracker in overview.

Specifically you would be looking for:
"SEC. 303. Assessment of potential effectiveness of and requirements for the establishment of safe zones or a no-fly zone in Syria."

Which gets into the Safe Spaces and No-Fly Zone for Syria.

Originally Posted by skarlorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

good thing daywolf's intel will affect literally nothing

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
right now for us to control all the airspace in Syria would require us to go to war with Syria and Russia -- Gen. Joseph Funford


And I find it really interesting that then they called out this plane at the time of this passage for a nuclear attack drill. And we are also seeing NATO move into position for such an event, a position that could blitzkrieg into Russia.

[aMindAmok]

Syria now has safe spaces? Can we send them our triggered generation to test their effectiveness?

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by aMindAmok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Syria now has safe spaces? Can we send them our triggered generation to test their effectiveness?

Well yeah it was written by a dem from NY. It reflects exactly what HRC said in the debate concerning her intention to create a no-fly zone and "safe zones" in Syria. More like safe spaces, like I said here back then. Then Trump stomped her of course, how every stupid idea they have Putin just grabs more territory. Those safe zones would probably be the most dangerous places in the country, much like a gun free zone in a gay night club.

See the vid I linked? Damn warmongers like McCain angry because the Gen. pointed out the obvious, that the result would be a war with Russia. And you see why Bush voted for HRC, and all the Dems follow right along. Aint no difference, they all want the same thing, a big fat war.