|
View Poll Results: Does he | |||
Yes | 27 | 28.13% | |
No | 14 | 14.58% | |
George Bush coughed on the towers | 55 | 57.29% | |
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#981
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#982
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm not advocating libertarianism--my simplistic gut take is that it requires a higher IQ parity than humanity demonstrates and is therefore political philosophic wankery. I prefer my governing systems to pay at least lip service to protecting the stupid from the amoral. | |||
|
#983
|
|||
|
Republicans and Evangelicals don't care about human life. They just want other people to have sex by their rules. Abortion should be a conversation between the woman and her doctor. Anyone else is just invading her private decisions and forcing their morality and religion on her.
| ||
|
#984
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also you’re advocating killing tiny humans and waving the morality flag, it’s astounding the leap of ignorance that takes. The left is the one forcing its ideas on the country. Redefining terms at breakneck speeds. Racism, marriage these no longer means what they truly mean. Men and women are social constructs, it’s pure lunacy. Now packing the court is being defined as appointing judges just like all other presidents have done in the past. The left continues to not like what America was founded on. They champion ideas that have failed across the globe for ages. They carry with them a childish view of humanity and fail to apply common sense to their policies. Make no mistake the Left is trying to rip the heart and soul out of the greatest force of global well-being in our species history. Vote R | |||
|
#985
|
||||
|
Quote:
Such is Libertarianism. | |||
|
#986
|
|||
|
Wait a minute let me get this straight you say that the Democrats are trying to use the Scotus to legislate and now we're all posting about how abortion is wrong implying you want the Scotus to make it so it can’t be done?
So as someone who doesn’t like either political party I feel like the right is packing the court to legislate. The court will need 11 judges so america doesn’t legislate with the Scotus. The question isn’t do you like abortion the question is do you want legislation coming from the Scotus because you made it clear that the left does that, but using the Scotus to repeal row versus Wade is literately that. Can you find me an example where the Scotus is used to create legislation that is pro liberal or leftist? I’m just curious because I really don’t know do you do you guys have any examples of that? Row versus Wade is not leftist, it’s Anti-federalist. It seems the only one trying to create legislation’s are the ones that are trying to use Scotus to encourage evangelicals that desperately want that, to vote for them. For the record I’m pro life I think that life begins the moment a child would be born if you were to live your life normally and do nothing to stop it. If a mother eats and sleeps for nine months a baby comes out of them the only way a baby won’t come out of them is if they actively do something to kill the baby. But that’s totally my opinion that I only tell my friends I don’t think that that’s an opinion that I should force on anyone! I get that it seems similar to me allowing murder but I’m sorry if you think those two things are the same then we might as well force masks because that also saves lives. So I don’t see how you could be pro protecting a fetus but not pro protecting people that are vulnerable to Covid. | ||
Last edited by Jibartik; 10-13-2020 at 12:43 PM..
|
|
#987
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
This is why I dont get it. Again, im pro life, just pro constitution as well, and in this instance the democrats are the ones protecting it. The conversation isnt about your moral stance on abortion, its about if you think the scotus should legislate or not. This proves that you need democrats and republicans to fight for the constitution, it proves that we need a balanced number of judges, not a court packed with one ideology that thinks it's protecting the sanctity of life. If one political party, packs the court with their ideology, we need balance, we need the other side. Otherwise, legislating is exactly what you're trying to do. | ||||
Last edited by Jibartik; 10-13-2020 at 01:09 PM..
|
|
#988
|
|||
|
Righties appoint to uphold the Constitution. Lefties appoint to make laws they can’t get passed via legislation.
The 14th amendment states ”... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The right to life is in the constitution. As Bellamy said, privacy isn’t in the constitution, which is the backbone of RvW. The left is eroding the constitution, along with the executive branch power creep. | ||
|
#989
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||
|
#990
|
|||
|
The sanctity of life is in the 14th amendment. Meaning it was already a thing, changing that is legislating against the Constitution. So there or the judges who vow to uphold that are not changing laws they are upholding existing virtues that this country was founded on.
| ||
|
|
|