Quote:
Originally Posted by America
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If we want discourse media that allow the little guy to affect change, we well and truly need not to puritanically scrub commercial websites, with only ultra-massive companies able to regulate discussion boards adequately, to avoid being filed in the "porn" category. Imagine a world where the only collective medium of public discussion is Facebook. That is the UK now.
And the tyranny there will affect Americans as the big dogs comply to guard market share. It will be cheaper to maintain only one regime of Anglophone site moderation. British degeneracy is a scourge upon the Earth.
|
I agree.
I'm all for free markets. But, what we have now (at least in America) is not the free market. It's monopolistic corporations in bed with big government. This includes the media, including social media platforms, such as Facebook, twitter, youtube, etc. In order to keep their far left globalist agenda going forward, they try to silence those they disagree with. Then, when there are alternate social media platforms that promote free speech (such as gab), the hosting providers or pay platforms drop them.
I despise censorship. But that is exactly what is happening all around the world. In the US, the far left globalists are trying all they can to censor opposing voices. They twist what people say, make up lies, change history to silence alternative views. I feel we are in the beginning stages of Orwell's 1984, with political correctness being new speak (determining what words are acceptable from one moment to the next).