#392
|
||||
|
Quote:
if the gov would ever take an individuals land, they would also take the banks. So there is no difference. Except in the current system the banks make all the money while the land owner pays inflated prices that they must desperately beg people to pay for their crops's inflated prices to make up for. It's a death spiral. If you rented the land from the gov and got rid of the banks, nothing would change but you'd have less inflation, and would worry about the quality of your crops and your time and enjoyment... cropping(?) them... A key component is understanding that owning a renters contract is the same as owning a mortgage or deed, when you have that, it's a lock until you want to get rid of it. There is a 1:1 similarity between a renters contract with the goverment as a mortage with the bank, except its about 10,000% cheaper [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
Last edited by Jibartik; 08-10-2021 at 03:41 PM..
|
#393
|
||||
|
Quote:
Read Locke, Madison and Jefferson | |||
#394
|
|||
|
Yeah I get that, but I'd argue that is a construct.
Like I'm sure in another dimension the idea that you have to buy a home from a bank and not the goverment they say that is the core tenement to freedom. | ||
#395
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
#397
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
#399
|
|||
|
Self sufficiency is not on the menu
| ||
#400
|
|||
|
| ||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|