Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 01-20-2021, 06:37 PM
Gustoo Gustoo is offline
Planar Protector

Gustoo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The side of Bristlebane
Posts: 5,918
Default

Didn't you hear Bonethunder? https://babylonbee.com/news/prophets...al-not-literal
__________________
Discord PVP Server:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post
Lost but not forgotten.
  #42  
Old 01-20-2021, 06:52 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassawary [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There's no precedent for a President even being removed, so all your big city lawyer talk is just that - talk. ��
I don’t think you understand lol. There’s no precedent for a president being removed because no president has been bad enough to be convicted. However, it is a constititionally permitted remedy as a result of an impeachment conviction sooooo it is completely irrelevant whether there’s precedent or not. And there is precedent for it btw if you look at impeachment’s of other political/judicial figures.

Lol are you really this clueless?
  #43  
Old 01-20-2021, 07:03 PM
Cassawary Cassawary is offline
Planar Protector

Cassawary's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don’t think you understand lol. There’s no precedent for a president being removed because no president has been bad enough to be convicted. However, it is a constititionally permitted remedy as a result of an impeachment conviction sooooo it is completely irrelevant whether there’s precedent or not. And there is precedent for it btw if you look at impeachment’s of other political/judicial figures.

Lol are you really this clueless?
The high court would definitely grant cert to the immediate challenge. Constitutional Precedent is what they live for. It's not something an insurance lawyer would understand.
  #44  
Old 01-20-2021, 07:23 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassawary [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The high court would definitely grant cert to the immediate challenge. Constitutional Precedent is what they live for. It's not something an insurance lawyer would understand.
Lol no they probably wouldn't. SCOTUS has explicitly said in the past that SCOTUS has no place in determining impeachment proceedings. The only role SCOTUS plays is that the Chief Justice moderates the trial in the Senate.

SCOTUS getting involved would be a breach of the separate roles of the branches of government, which is what SCOTUS has said. Know your history bud!
  #45  
Old 01-20-2021, 07:41 PM
Cassawary Cassawary is offline
Planar Protector

Cassawary's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol no they probably wouldn't. SCOTUS has explicitly said in the past that SCOTUS has no place in determining impeachment proceedings. The only role SCOTUS plays is that the Chief Justice moderates the trial in the Senate.

SCOTUS getting involved would be a breach of the separate roles of the branches of government, which is what SCOTUS has said. Know your history bud!
Barring him from office at this point would be stripping a private citizen of part of their franchise.

You're silly.
  #46  
Old 01-20-2021, 07:48 PM
imperiouskitten imperiouskitten is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: CROATOAN
Posts: 2,979
Default

feels good to know he's gone. Trump presidency was the most chaotic period of my life. Here's to some stability and sanity [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #47  
Old 01-20-2021, 08:02 PM
Gwaihir Gwaihir is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: SJ
Posts: 2,181
Default

You all are tarded. We don't live in a country where our former presidents can be found panhandling at a freeway onramp.
  #48  
Old 01-20-2021, 08:04 PM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassawary [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Barring him from office at this point would be stripping a private citizen of part of their franchise.

You're silly.
The impeachment occurred before he left office so it’s a valid impeachment and the senate must hear the trial. You’d be right if they had tried to do the actual impeachment after he left office.

He’s also not being stripped of any of his private franchise. Nothing he’d be stripped of is his right as a private citizen.
  #49  
Old 01-20-2021, 08:04 PM
Caroll Caroll is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonethunder [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The election was a scam he lost nothing, look at the maps. They fed stacks of biden ballots in the machines over and over in battleground cities like philly and pittsburgh / atlanta etc

sorry you lost at life
Reporting you for ban evasion. I win again.
  #50  
Old 01-20-2021, 08:06 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

After 2020 ended, I feel like we just survived a car crash. Idk if it's going to catch on fire and we're all going to burn to death, but we survived a car crash.

So we got that going for us.

Which is nice.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.