Raid Suspending best idea GM's had in a long time

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Maner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

AM as in aftermath, not in the morning

All the same, that's 2 guilds worth of raiders. Assuming Awakened has just as many, that's 4 guilds worth of raiders taking most of the content, and probably another 20 guilds worth of raiders spread across the rest of the guilds that could all handle the content if given an uncontested shot. 24 guilds worth of raiders for what, 57 mobs a week? Doesn't seem very classic at all.

[Swish]

It would be interesting if, on the day they came back there was an earthquake as a test for "what did you learn during your suspension?"... see if petitionquest and crying wolf is the same meta and suspend them again if so.

[Naethyn]

Originally Posted by Mythanor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You mean the * we made a deal with the suspended guilds, to kill the pixels fast as possible, to keep the pixel dropping mob spawn timers as close as possible, for when the suspended guilds come back, even though we didnt have to for said suspended guilds* .... that dungeon crawling.. that the one you are moaning about as your lame excuse for douche baggery when able to raid?

You know, there was a time when players would coth up to each wing of tov (north, west, east) to kill a dragon. The first winter of Velious was amazing. Clear the guards and pull the dragons to areas without zone wide trains. The thing is - it was a casual guild that started the pull to zoneline tactic that everyone (including those who still claim they want to clear) uses. The truth is 99% of us are lazy, and not really looking for a true adventure, and want to put in as little as possible to get the most amount pixels.

[Maner]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All the same, that's 2 guilds worth of raiders. Assuming Awakened has just as many, that's 4 guilds worth of raiders taking most of the content, and probably another 20 guilds worth of raiders spread across the rest of the guilds that could all handle the content if given an uncontested shot. 24 guilds worth of raiders for what, 57 mobs a week? Doesn't seem very classic at all.

how do you figure? every raid entity this weekend brought 100+ to the table. I dont know what server you played on during live, but there were 3 top guilds on mine and 6-7 guilds below them that picked up the scraps.

Putting arbitrary numbers on what is a guild worth of raiders also seems kinda stupid. Wasn't the raid limit 72 on live when they first put in the raid group? Seems like 80 people is a lot more like live than 120-150

[Zekayy]

Play Uthgard none of this concede or fraps bullshit we fight like true men in 40 man rvrs where real wars are settled.

[Lammy]

god you're so manly

[Ciroco]

Originally Posted by Naethyn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That said, if the VP rotation didn't prove it already, the we want to crawl/clear to dragons plea holds no weight at all.

Not that I'm into crawling, but I'm interested to hear how you'd expect any raidforce to crawl through ToV when the targets that are all up are split up between various guilds.

[Skew]

Originally Posted by Godefroi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm playing return of reckoning for proper RvR , and it's quite awesome.

Doing 48 vs 48 atm and it's quite fun !

not heard of that. looking at their website now. is it like larger form guildwars?

[LostCause]

its a warhammer online emu server.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by LostCause [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

its a warhammer online emu server.

I've been a fan of Games Workshop's settings, but when this game was live I was not in a position to play.

Is the game/emu any good?