This is how you get a thread locked! - Page 13

purist · #**121** 10-20-2010, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by President [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The overwhelming consensus so far is fuckable only. Exactly which you just said....

Wait.. I said that the scale is for fuckable chicks only?

When? Show me where, please.

The general consensus is that the minimum rating that most men would consider fucking is somewhere around a 4.

That's my position, and it corresponds to the general consensus. I have never stated anything else. You're either retarded, or confusing someone else's post with mine.

President · #**122** 10-20-2010, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wait.. I said that the scale is for fuckable chicks only?

When? Show me where, please.

The general consensus is that the minimum rating that most men would consider fucking is somewhere around a 4.

That's my position, and it corresponds to the general consensus. I have never stated anything else. You're either retarded, or confusing someone else's post with mine.

Jesus man. Go back and read the other posts on previous pages. You referred to the general consensus. There were 3 or so people stating you have to be fuckable to get into my 1-10, that, overall is the general consensus. Unless you are talking about the general consensus between you and your male modeling friends?

purist · #**123** 10-20-2010, 04:42 PM

k, two people on page 12 of a Project 99 forum thread are now ambassadors of the male gender, and account fully for the gender's general consensus.

President · #**124** 10-20-2010, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

k, two people on page 12 of a Project 99 forum thread are now ambassadors of the male gender, and account fully for the gender's general consensus.

I have never heard one single person in my life refer to "4" as being the number for fuckable on a scale of 1-10. Not one.

Not one in this post either.

So, how I am supposed to magically assume that is the "general consensus" and not think that you are referring to the consensus on this thread is beyond me.

purist · #**125** 10-20-2010, 04:44 PM

Hey, lets split hairs about me claiming the mantle of the general consensus for 5 more pages.

President · #**126** 10-20-2010, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey, lets split hairs about me claiming the mantle of the general consensus for 5 more pages.

I'm more interested in seeing a picture lineup of your scale. If for nothing more to pass time looking at hot girls while at work.

**nilbog** · #**127** 10-20-2010, 04:48 PM

Text is text.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

carry on!

President · #**128** 10-20-2010, 04:48 PM

very nice Nilbog.

purist · #**129** 10-20-2010, 04:48 PM

I was in the process of until you digressed for 3 pages to make a pendantic, childish point. Now I'm more interested in:

Why you calibrate your hotness scale by scoping the women of Walmart.

Since you say the scale is fuckable only, why you consider the following women to be THREES.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

President · #**130** 10-20-2010, 04:54 PM

The scale isn't fuckable only. Thats what other people said. I consider my scale a scale of hotness. Fuckable on my scale would be 7+.