I N D I C T E D

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So site the section you wish to discuss. You're not exactly pwning the libs rn.

It's the entire 2nd page.

As long as you're continuing to be retarded, I won't have to pwn the libs because you're doing a great job pwning yourself.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Barr lied today about multiple aspects of the Mueller report and mischaracterized it in his summary.

Today he said that Mueller did not reach a decision about indictment based on the OLC opinion. The Mueller report explicitly States that as the reason he didn't make a decision.

Barr said he didn't know if Mueller intended for Congress to receive the information. The report states clearly that they didn't want to interfere with Constitutional means of dealing with Presidential misconduct. The Constitution grants all of those powers to the legislative branch explicitly.

Barr stated that we don't open grand jury investigations for the purpose of giving information to Congress, ignoring the fact that both Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton had grand jury information used by Congress to force Nixon out and impeach Clinton.

Barr implied that in his summary that Mueller didn't make a decision on obstruction because the decision was too difficult and that there was evidence that exonerated Trump of obstruction. I see nothing exculpatory in Mueller's report on obstruction and they are very clear and firm as to why they didn't indict or decline to indict on obstruction.

Barr's only statements and actions with regards to the Mueller report have been riddled with misinformation and outright lies designed to mislead the public about the nature and extent of the investigation.

One of Nixon's articles of impeachment contained exactly that charge. He lied to the American people about the nature and extent of the investigation while also falsely claiming that it had all but been completed. Both Trump and Barr have done this, publicly as Nixon did, and should both be removed from office.

Barr's only purpose with regards to the Mueller investigation has been to deceive and mislead the American people and Congress.

Whoever wrote this (not you) is stretching beyond belief.

[Jaxon]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is exactly the outcome I'm hoping for. If the Senate clears trump without performing any due diligence, that will help us flip the Senate.

It would be viewed as a proportional and appropriate response to playing games; if the House isn't going to take impeachment seriously, why should the Senate? It would be a really bad move for the Democrats I hope they take you up on your suggestion.

[feniin]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Whoever wrote this (not you) is stretching beyond belief.

reddit copy pasta - explain where they're stretching? seems like a reasonable conclusion to anyone with eyes, ears, and a functioning brain.

[DMN]

Originally Posted by AenorVZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is exactly the outcome I'm hoping for. If the Senate clears trump without performing any due diligence, that will help us flip the Senate.

Worked real well for the republicans impeaching rapist/serial killer Clinton.

[feniin]

Over the weekend, Republicans for the Rule of Law will air an advertisement on Fox News urging GOP lawmakers to hold Trump accountable for “lying” and “obstructing justice,” like Republicans had done with former Democratic President Bill Clinton more than 20 years ago, when a GOP-led House succesfully impeached Clinton on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. Clinton was subsequently acquitted on all charges after a trial in the Senate.

“The Mueller Report revealed multiple instances of President Trump lying and obstructing justice. Twenty years ago, Republicans denounced a Democratic president for lying and obstructing justice,” the 34-second advertisement’s opening reads, before cutting to old clips of GOP lawmakers condemning Clinton on Capitol Hill. “Republicans stood for the rule of law then. We should stand for the rule of law now,” it concludes.

The advertisement’s goal, according to Longwell, is to “encourage speaking up from Republicans."

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

reddit copy pasta - explain where they're stretching? seems like a reasonable conclusion to anyone with eyes, ears, and a functioning brain.

Let me guess, you got it from /r/politics?

Lol well first of all, no one is calling for Trump's and Barr's removal. So ya know, that idea is fringe.

[feniin]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me guess, you got it from /r/politics?

Lol well first of all, no one is calling for Trump's and Barr's removal. So ya know, that idea is fringe.

Uh, what?

Of course there's a shit ton of people calling for both. You must live in one weird, secluded echo chamber.

[DinoTriz2]

I seriously hope Democrats waste their time trying to investigate and/or impeach.

Pelosi already said she wouldn't allow impeachment.

Oh, and CNN found out embarrassingly that 0% of people in their poll felt as if the Russian investigation was the most important issue.

So please shoot yourselves in the foot again. I swear the Democrats are on the verge of lolcow status.

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Uh, what?

Of course there's a shit ton of people calling for both. You must live in one weird, secluded echo chamber.

I haven't heard it from CNN or MSNBC.