did 2hand improvement effect rangers?

[radbeard]

I know there was some 2hand formula change that made 2handers better overall. Did that effect rangers too? Is Woodsman staff more effective than it used to be as a result? Thanks!

[Toxigen]

nah pretty sure rangers are still bad outside of speedbumping raid targets

[Crede]

Yes, the 2h bonus would make rangers better with woodmans staff.

[MiRo2]

I believe it just affected the 2 hander damage bonus, which isn't really noticable with weapons with less than 40 delay.

[Gozuk]

Chicks dig dual wield

[radbeard]

okay, thanks for the help! Is it the case then that the 2hand bonuses are now as listed here: https://lucy.allakhazam.com/dmgbonus.html?setcookie=1 ?

[Crede]

I don’t think anyone knows the exact 2h bonus here except that it gets better with higher delay. Either way I’d rock woodmans staff 20-50+ until you can replace with offhand epic and a respectable primary weapon like sboz or better.

[Yinein]

Cek 2h outdps my kriezen flame usually. 2h the way to go

[Baler]

rangers != knights

[Yinein]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

rangers != knights

That's true, they are better