|
|
#12
06-01-2022, 11:25 PM
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Happy now?
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|||||
|
#14
06-01-2022, 11:45 PM
|
|||||
|
nice tonsure
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#15
06-02-2022, 08:48 AM
|
|||
|
Perhaps it would be best to simply state there is nothing wrong with orthodox Catholicism and it is and should always be well respected as the primary Christian faith. With all others being shades of Christianity. Without the inherently certain salvation of Catholicism.
Adventists r pretty weird. For example. Many have fallen from righteousness too. I suppose ppl will always try to follow weird religions. Catholicism should not bend to meet them though. Those people should come to Catholicism perhaps of their own folly in following their own faiths. They would be better catholics for it in the end. Ratzinger mentions the folly of political engagement. Many Royals fell away from the church and in doing so the church bent to meet the Royals halfway on new ground. I like him. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] He was never truly progressive. He cared about them. He also cares about the church and faith. That's no sin. I would say if the Royals come to the church it's fine. If the church goes to the Royals on their terms it's not. Political engagement isn't black and white in this scenario. The people should want Royals with the mandate of the church. If you give your mandate to just any royal, what is it even worth anymore? You cannot remain pure and righteous by bending to populism. You can't save everyone. | ||
|
Last edited by starkind; 06-02-2022 at 09:00 AM..
|
|
||
|
#16
06-02-2022, 04:24 PM
|
|||
|
A person who hacked their pee-pee off is going to talk about true faiths. Whatever you are dedicated to I want no part of.
__________________
 | ||
|
|
|||
|
#17
06-02-2022, 04:30 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#18
06-02-2022, 04:38 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
