Internal Consistency

[cannobeers3]

I hope they are not still teaching that graphic to children, but then again, we can have a chat about the US public education system...

[myrddraal]

Vanquish provided zero evidence to support the need for a concession in the moment and went radio silent when asked for it, where Kittens and Riot provided plenty. Vanquish also engaged less than 10 minutes after where there was a near full wipe on klazdaxthum’s train. Apples and oranges but nice spin.

[Pulgasari]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by myrddraal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Vanquish provided zero evidence to support the need for a concession in the moment and went radio silent when asked for it

If you are upset that Vulak should not have been conceded, then please take it up with your leadership. The concession didn't come until Vulak was at less than 5% on a Vanquish engage, though, so the concession seems superficial at best, anyway.

Originally Posted by myrddraal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

where Kittens and Riot provided plenty.

Exactly zero evidence was provided until 4 days after the event. The first half dozen or so videos showed ambiguous fault and assist on Riot members.

Originally Posted by myrddraal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Vanquish also engaged less than 10 minutes after where there was a near full wipe on klazdaxthum’s train. Apples and oranges but nice spin.

The two scenarios probably look very similar to anybody without a biased point of view. KRIOT accuses Vanquish of training them on Vanquish engage. Vanquish accuses KRIOT of training them on KRIOT engage. The differences were in the skill level of handling the train and the recovery. Vanquish members immediately camped when told to do so. KRIOT members are audibly told to camp in their videos and did not. KRIOT had a chance after their train to engage and failed. The biggest difference is that Vanquish did not fail on their attempt after the KRIOT train.

[xdrcfrx]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you are upset that Vulak should not have been conceded, then please take it up with your leadership. The concession didn't come until Vulak was at less than 5% on a Vanquish engage, though, so the concession seems superficial at best, anyway.



Exactly zero evidence was provided until 4 days after the event. The first half dozen or so videos showed ambiguous fault and assist on Riot members.



The two scenarios probably look very similar to anybody without a biased point of view. KRIOT accuses Vanquish of training them on Vanquish engage. Vanquish accuses KRIOT of training them on KRIOT engage. The differences were in the skill level of handling the train and the recovery. Vanquish members immediately camped when told to do so. KRIOT members are audibly told to camp in their videos and did not. KRIOT had a chance after their train to engage and failed. The biggest difference is that Vanquish did not fail on their attempt after the KRIOT train.

Reading the things you write is like listening to Baghdad Bob talk about how the city would never fall. You are living in a false reality. Seek help.

[condap99]

Originally Posted by xdrcfrx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reading the things you write is like listening to Baghdad Bob talk about how the city would never fall. You are living in a false reality. Seek help.

Oh? Is there a difference between 10 people dying and 25 people dying? Is there a difference when one guild responds as if play on the field matters and mitigates the risk versus the other looking for the opportunity to flop on the field and pray the ref sees it?

The circumstances were the same.

How the guilds responded shows the exact differences in guild culture, and how they view winning.

It's no coincidence that KRIOT is losing every competitive Vulak. Neither are applicant numbers.

[xdrcfrx]

Originally Posted by condap99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh? Is there a difference between 10 people dying and 25 people dying? Is there a difference when one guild responds as if play on the field matters and mitigates the risk versus the other looking for the opportunity to flop on the field and pray the ref sees it?

The circumstances were the same.

How the guilds responded shows the exact differences in guild culture, and how they view winning.

It's no coincidence that KRIOT is losing every competitive Vulak. Neither are applicant numbers.

the only flopping on the field was Klaz, who flopped a bunch of flurry drakes on us.

The difference between 25 and 10 is 15. Sorry you don't math, hope this helps.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by xdrcfrx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reading the things you write is like listening to Baghdad Bob talk about how the city would never fall. You are living in a false reality. Seek help.

YOU'RE GASLIGHTING ME. REEEEEE.

[xdrcfrx]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

REEEEEE.

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

REEEEEE.