Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #231  
Old 05-15-2021, 01:46 AM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azxten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quality post, I'm in the same boat. P99 has become a custom EQEmu server and is no longer attempting to recreate classic.

Channeling proves this to me. Proof provided that P99 channeling is obscenely far away from classic values and the staff just lets the bug report fade away with not even a single comment. We put tons of work into researching bugs and figuring things out and it just sits there. Devs occasionally making a "fixed pending update" response to some trivial bullshit bug and leaving the major issues to fester unaddressed.

There is no point hearing endless morons try to justify how it's just slow computers or player knowledge that explains how channeling rates at level 1 on P99 are 50-70% successful compared to 10% on live. Such a core mechanic like this being overlooked shows no one is interested in classic EQ anymore.

Classic EQ is too hard and takes too much time to get raid pixels so we'll just smooth some of these rough edges so the raid scene can be a boring bottlenecked cluster fuck that no one enjoys but is fully available to even the dumbest greenest newb to EQ after a couple weeks of playing. WoW players don't like a 10% chance to cast a spell in combat when they start, they won't play if we fix it.
I believe the staff has said that channeling is something to do with the client code or something like that and not something that’s easily fixable at all. So go on keep criticizing them for something they can’t do anything about.

At any rate if you dislike P99 so much go play another server. Not like you contribute much positive here
  #232  
Old 05-15-2021, 01:51 AM
Tethler Tethler is offline
Planar Protector

Tethler's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,312
Default

Druid charm was terrible too. I wasn't able to charm with any degree of success until PoP when I solo'd the werewolf camp in Plane of Nightmare for piles and piles of diamonds and blue diamonds that dropped there.
__________________
  #233  
Old 05-15-2021, 02:56 AM
starkind starkind is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 6,357
Default

eehh, I am sorry to bring up these feels for ya'll.

really its fine

pros and cons ppl

its different, not 'bad'

personally, if i couldnt fix channeling, i'd thro a bandaid on the heavily abused spells like charm idk, 3x cast time, or like 70% resist rate for the lolz (because that'd be accurate! to 'feels') but thats custom and wouldnt want it to stay that way
  #234  
Old 05-15-2021, 03:04 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,332
Default

Could just boost the chance to interrupt on hit. Would be an unclassic nerf on corner tanked casting but could make channeling more classic in most other situations.
__________________

Gorgen (Blue) - Agnostic Troll Warrior of the XXXI Dung

  #235  
Old 05-15-2021, 03:12 AM
RecondoJoe RecondoJoe is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tethler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Druid charm was terrible too. I wasn't able to charm with any degree of success until PoP when I solo'd the werewolf camp in Plane of Nightmare for piles and piles of diamonds and blue diamonds that dropped there.
  #236  
Old 05-15-2021, 11:41 AM
Twochain Twochain is offline
Fire Giant

Twochain's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sebilis
Posts: 595
Default

Wow I think Hyjal really proved me right

The issue wasn't with the spells. The issue was with Knowledge and computer limitations.

IDK about you guys, but i was literally playing everquest with less than 10 fps sometimes on live. And laggy internet. Meaning if the pet broke, I hardly had time to react before it was beating me.

LET ALONE i can't remember a SINGLE enchanter on live who used aoe stun in my groups. Meaning, the most likely scenario of enchanters trying to recharm was just tanking it until the spell landed. And were they even using Tash?
__________________
60 GrandMaster <Aftermath>
Tarew Marr former <Noble Lion>
  #237  
Old 05-15-2021, 12:28 PM
starkind starkind is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 6,357
Default

what does an mri of a starkind look like?
  #238  
Old 05-15-2021, 12:55 PM
Delekhan Delekhan is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twochain [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wow I think Hyjal really proved me right

The issue wasn't with the spells. The issue was with Knowledge and computer limitations.

IDK about you guys, but i was literally playing everquest with less than 10 fps sometimes on live. And laggy internet. Meaning if the pet broke, I hardly had time to react before it was beating me.

LET ALONE i can't remember a SINGLE enchanter on live who used aoe stun in my groups. Meaning, the most likely scenario of enchanters trying to recharm was just tanking it until the spell landed. And were they even using Tash?
LOL chanters Tashed in classic, and yes they stunned all the time. Chanters knew how to play their class. I know this comes at a shock, but classic players that were adults at the time actually did have decent computers and broadband during this Era. Not all classic everquest players were 12 year olds, you know.
  #239  
Old 05-15-2021, 01:17 PM
bwe bwe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twochain [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wow I think Hyjal really proved me right

The issue wasn't with the spells. The issue was with Knowledge and computer limitations.

IDK about you guys, but i was literally playing everquest with less than 10 fps sometimes on live. And laggy internet. Meaning if the pet broke, I hardly had time to react before it was beating me.

LET ALONE i can't remember a SINGLE enchanter on live who used aoe stun in my groups. Meaning, the most likely scenario of enchanters trying to recharm was just tanking it until the spell landed. And were they even using Tash?
Whoa this guy's brain is fully intact too
  #240  
Old 05-15-2021, 01:44 PM
Delekhan Delekhan is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 58
Default

An average gamer PC in 1999-2000:

Pentium 2 300 or better (Even Pentium 3 was out by then)
3DFX Voodoo 2 (and some cheap 2d card) or a Geforce 256 later in 1999
7200 RPM Hard drive
256MB RAM
Cable/DSL internet (widely available at this point in urban/suburban areas)

The above would run EQ at 1024x768 at 60fps, no problem.

If you did not have this because you were too young and were using a hand-me down PC and were a kid at the time, that's understandable, but that's what gamer rigs looked like back then and gamers played EQ. Enough with the hardware nonsense, please. This game ran just fine on hardware at the time.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.