Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Priests

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-17-2019, 12:53 PM
Droxx Droxx is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don’t really understand why Bane > Poxx

Poxx is better Damage per Mana, lasts around the same amount of time as your epic (18 and 15 ticks respectively). There are some cases where Bane is better (kills are happening quicker etc), but primarily I find Poxx is always a better go to for efficiency.
I find a lot more things 50+ resist Pox than Bane (even with Insidious Decay), presumably because Malosini is -60 PR while Insidious Decay is -40 DR.
__________________
Droxx - 60 Oracle!
Xord - 60 Phantasmist!
Phillip - 60 Grandmaster!
Celent - 60 Sorcerer!
Stratah - 58 Troubadour!
Joan - 58 Knight!
Colin - 52 Rake!

Guild Leader of <Eclipse>
  #12  
Old 08-17-2019, 02:16 PM
Wendak Wendak is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Droxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I find a lot more things 50+ resist Pox than Bane (even with Insidious Decay), presumably because Malosini is -60 PR while Insidious Decay is -40 DR.
Fair. I haven’t had too much issue with Poxx being resisted, but I haven’t done many crazy high end soloing.
  #13  
Old 08-17-2019, 02:55 PM
Lojik Lojik is offline
Planar Protector

Lojik's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,954
Default

Speaking from experience killing ww dragons, pox was resisted more often (anecdotal) and also required additional debuff spell. Bane wears off fast enough that there's not usually enough instances where you have time to do pox/bane/epic/torpor, and it's often good enough to just throw in a jbb nuke when you get a chance. Also there's something to be said for the greater DPS of bane (esp since you don't want a pet v. Dragons,) even though dpm in perfect instances isn't as good as pox.
  #14  
Old 08-18-2019, 10:54 AM
Xenmir Xenmir is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lojik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Speaking from experience killing ww dragons, pox was resisted more often (anecdotal) and also required additional debuff spell. Bane wears off fast enough that there's not usually enough instances where you have time to do pox/bane/epic/torpor, and it's often good enough to just throw in a jbb nuke when you get a chance. Also there's something to be said for the greater DPS of bane (esp since you don't want a pet v. Dragons,) even though dpm in perfect instances isn't as good as pox.
Why no pet v Dragons? Never soloed them myself.
  #15  
Old 08-18-2019, 11:03 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,320
Default

I guess AOE means it doesn't do the damage per summon to justify the mana or time?
  #16  
Old 08-18-2019, 11:28 AM
Ostepop Ostepop is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Norway
Posts: 89
Default

Pet causes the dragons to rampage. Combined with dispell AE you can't really keep it alive.
  #17  
Old 08-18-2019, 04:05 PM
Kinaki Kinaki is offline
Aviak

Kinaki's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Droxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I find a lot more things 50+ resist Pox than Bane (even with Insidious Decay), presumably because Malosini is -60 PR while Insidious Decay is -40 DR.
Insidious Malady
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.