******Official politics thread ******

[Thorondor]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why do married people get tax breaks?

umm hate to break it to you, but there are a large number of people that are getting "married" outside of the eyes of the law, claiming unknown on the childrens birth certificates, and then claiming single parent benefits to avoid the financial implications that uniting incomes in the eyes of the law entails bud.

They're amongst the "pets" you swaddle yourselves in, so you'd hardpressed to get any kind of support in eliminating that little "loophole" [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Thorondor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

umm hate to break it to you, but there are a large number of people that are getting "married" outside of the eyes of the law, claiming unknown on the childrens birth certificates, and then claiming single parent benefits to avoid the financial implications that uniting incomes in the eyes of the law entails bud.

They're amongst the "pets" you swaddle yourselves in, so you'd hardpressed to get any kind of support in eliminating that little "loophole" [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

isn't that allowed for the same reason?

[DinoTriz2]

I'm bored. I think I want to join the Proud Boys.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Thorondor]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

isn't that allowed for the same reason?

Its not "allowed" but short of forcing a DNA test upon a presumptive union its impossible to prove that they knowingly comitted felony fraud by conspiring to lie about the parentage on the birth certificate then there are a slew of additional civil and criminal charges that presumably follow the initial crime when the state's coffers are drained by collecting benefits under false pretenses, but if shorty's down to game the system with you then whats really hood?

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Thorondor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Its not "allowed" but short of forcing a DNA test upon a presumptive union its impossible to prove that they knowingly comitted felony fraud by conspiring to lie about the parentage on the birth certificate then there are a slew of additional civil and criminal charges that presumably follow the initial crime when the state's coffers are drained by collecting benefits under false pretenses, but if shorty's down to game the system with you then whats really hood?

that pesky 4th amendment!

[Thorondor]

With all the power the left seeks to relegate to the govt, Id imagine some time down the road the government will institute a mandatory DNA registry upon the populace, especially if unknown bastard lineage gaming the system continues to rise.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Thorondor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With all the power the left seeks to relegate to the govt, Id imagine some time down the road the government will institute a mandatory DNA registry upon the populace, especially if unknown bastard lineage gaming the system continues to rise.

imagine whatever you like, the constitution still exists

[Thorondor]

Which arrangement is more advantageous, though? A minor increase to rhe standardized deduction in an economic environment that, essentially, requires a 2income household, or a 1income household that provides free healthcare food and housing benefits, a stay at home parent, and the freedom for that 1 income to scale to infinity without reduction in said benefits, or less than 1,000$ in decreased tax liability, and a 1000$ tax credit, c
With exprbinant childcare, and family healthcare costs made inflationary AND mandatory by the state to offset the increasing costs of the former?

IMO, those women willing to game the system at the risk of daddy possibly leaving the home scottfree in the future are making a better calculated decision then all these hoes looking to turn their self sacrificing husband into an atm for a few years so they can catch a stray cock from time to time without reprecussion, but what do i know?

We should Feniin's feedback on this one.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Thorondor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Which arrangement is more advantageous, though? A minor increase to rhe standardized deduction in an economic environment that, essentially, requires a 2income household, or a 1income household that provides free healthcare food and housing benefits, a stay at home parent, and the freedom for that 1 income to scale to infinity without reduction in said benefits, or less than 1,000$ in decreased tax liability, and a 1000$ tax credit, c
With exprbinant childcare, and family healthcare costs made inflationary AND mandatory by the state to offset the increasing costs of the former?

IMO, those women willing to game the system at the risk of daddy possibly leaving the home scottfree in the future are making a better calculated decision then all these hoes looking to turn their self sacrificing husband into an atm for a few years so they can catch a stray cock from time to time without reprecussion, but what do i know?

We should Feniin's feedback on this one.

it's racism all the way down Yertle

[Thorondor]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

imagine whatever you like, the constitution still exists

Not if you had your way with it. Ultimately, this little giveaway is all just a preamble to the clamp down your masters seek to impose on all of us once theyve finished wiping their ass with it, with your enthusiastic permission.