Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-30-2020, 02:19 PM
Mblake81 Mblake81 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bristlebane <Reckless Fury>
Posts: 1,811
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viscere [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you are guild removing yourself from <criot> cause you want to continue being homophobic ?
Close to your heart?
  #62  
Old 12-30-2020, 02:36 PM
feniin feniin is offline
Planar Protector

feniin's Avatar

Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 3,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viscere [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you are guild removing yourself from <criot> cause you want to continue being homophobic ?
You are/were guilded with a literal nazi and that doesn't bother you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #63  
Old 12-30-2020, 02:55 PM
KansasComrade KansasComrade is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heebs13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not trying to bash staff here, but frankly they're creating more work for themselves by being reactive instead of proactive.
This is at the heart of it all. Had we had clear rules about tracker fte not locking you out of other targets, Riot wouldn't have been pissed off about Lord K. Had we had clear speed limits laid out for ST, FRAG wouldn't have been upset about Riot using scale. Every time Detoxx pulls a screencap of a GM ruling from 3 years ago, I lose faith in the system because everyone should have all the same information laid out clearly.
  #64  
Old 12-30-2020, 03:52 PM
kaizersoze kaizersoze is offline
Sarnak

kaizersoze's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You are/were guilded with a literal nazi and that doesn't bother you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #65  
Old 12-30-2020, 03:54 PM
Heebs13 Heebs13 is offline
Kobold

Heebs13's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KansasComrade [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is at the heart of it all. Had we had clear rules about tracker fte not locking you out of other targets, Riot wouldn't have been pissed off about Lord K. Had we had clear speed limits laid out for ST, FRAG wouldn't have been upset about Riot using scale. Every time Detoxx pulls a screencap of a GM ruling from 3 years ago, I lose faith in the system because everyone should have all the same information laid out clearly.
Agreed, it's not helpful that the rules are spread out between 3 or 4 different threads and previous rulings set precedent but aren't easily searchable. The point I was trying to make was more that the GMs expect players to police themselves (via said vague rules) and submit petitions, which leaves the GMs having to spend their time playing "he said, she said" and rooting through logs and 5 different video recordings of a single event days or even weeks after the fact. It introduces a larger chance of them getting it wrong and it creates more work for them in the long run. They'd be much better off if they just actively refereed every contested raid target proactively, and the only way they could feasibly do that is if they quaked every week at a time of their choosing so they could make sure they're available for it.

GMs taking an afternoon to put all the raid rules in one spot would be a nice-to-have but as long as raiders are expected to police themselves, you're going to have a toxic raid environment. P99 has been lawyerquest since its inception a decade ago, through multiple raid rulesets. It's pretty clear that's the inevitable outcome of the self-policing system.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen View Post
P99ers do a lot of things well. Handling surprise adds / splitting up focus is not one of them. Mostly because the classes that do that the best (SK/Paladins) are generally trashed and considered useless, and because pulls are considered failures if a dragons doesn't appear at the zone line solo.
  #66  
Old 12-30-2020, 03:55 PM
Twochain Twochain is offline
Fire Giant

Twochain's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sebilis
Posts: 595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You are/were guilded with a literal nazi and that doesn't bother you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Are you talking about fuckin Sinix?

Sinix was never in Freedom. Sinix was in Aftermath. Sinix also is not that guy that people think he is. Can't think of his name at the moment.

Sinix played a good shaman. He didn't cause any problems while he was in Aftermath. Maybe he said some crazy shit in the past, but he doesn't even play this game anymore. Nor was he a problem starter when he did play with us. /shrug
__________________
60 GrandMaster <Aftermath>
Tarew Marr former <Noble Lion>
  #67  
Old 12-30-2020, 03:58 PM
Twochain Twochain is offline
Fire Giant

Twochain's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sebilis
Posts: 595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heebs13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Agreed, it's not helpful that the rules are spread out between 3 or 4 different threads and previous rulings set precedent but aren't easily searchable. The point I was trying to make was more that the GMs expect players to police themselves (via said vague rules) and submit petitions, which leaves the GMs having to spend their time playing "he said, she said" and rooting through logs and 5 different video recordings of a single event days or even weeks after the fact. It introduces a larger chance of them getting it wrong and it creates more work for them in the long run. They'd be much better off if they just actively refereed every contested raid target proactively, and the only way they could feasibly do that is if they quaked every week at a time of their choosing so they could make sure they're available for it.

GMs taking an afternoon to put all the raid rules in one spot would be a nice-to-have but as long as raiders are expected to police themselves, you're going to have a toxic raid environment. P99 has been lawyerquest since its inception a decade ago, through multiple raid rulesets. It's pretty clear that's the inevitable outcome of the self-policing system.
I completely agree that the rules are hard to follow because of how many different rulings there have been over the years, and the accessibility finding them in the first place.


But maybe the mf's who spend 10 hours making grand powerpoint presentations about an encounter that happened in 10 seconds took that energy and put it in to... idk.... say putting the raid rulings on the wiki........
__________________
60 GrandMaster <Aftermath>
Tarew Marr former <Noble Lion>
  #68  
Old 12-30-2020, 04:03 PM
Heebs13 Heebs13 is offline
Kobold

Heebs13's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twochain [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I completely agree that the rules are hard to follow because of how many different rulings there have been over the years, and the accessibility finding them in the first place.


But maybe the mf's who spend 10 hours making grand powerpoint presentations about an encounter that happened in 10 seconds took that energy and put it in to... idk.... say putting the raid rulings on the wiki........
A raid rules wiki page would probably be a good idea, and every rule needs to be backed up with either a link to a GM post or a screenshot of a GM ruling in game. Pulling out some random rule that isn't on the wiki during or after an encounter wouldn't be valid. A rule with no source wouldn't be valid.

Of course, you'd have to get the three major guilds (and probably the GMs) to agree to what I just said, and good fucking luck with that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen View Post
P99ers do a lot of things well. Handling surprise adds / splitting up focus is not one of them. Mostly because the classes that do that the best (SK/Paladins) are generally trashed and considered useless, and because pulls are considered failures if a dragons doesn't appear at the zone line solo.
  #69  
Old 12-30-2020, 04:27 PM
Naethyn Naethyn is offline
Fire Giant

Naethyn's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 996
Default

I started this.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...it?usp=sharing
__________________
  #70  
Old 12-30-2020, 04:29 PM
Molitoth Molitoth is offline
Sarnak

Molitoth's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twochain [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I completely agree that the rules are hard to follow because of how many different rulings there have been over the years, and the accessibility finding them in the first place.


But maybe the mf's who spend 10 hours making grand powerpoint presentations about an encounter that happened in 10 seconds took that energy and put it in to... idk.... say putting the raid rulings on the wiki........
Sirken already did this.... (and it's still available).
Some things could easily be edited.

All we have to do is get the current GM's to give a shit about enforcement.
Good luck.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.