the i dont care about politics anymore thread

[misterbonkers]

Originally Posted by Encroaching Death [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No.

IT WAS BEING SHOWN TO CHILDREN.

And STILL is.

That one article was talking about a random 14 year old.

how is it the guy who loves to take things out of context can't find an in context example of his arguments

peculiar

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

how is it the guy who loves to take things out of context can't find an in context example of his arguments

peculiar

I just linked one about Olympia schools allowing that specific book in their schools.

You just don't click the links.

peculiar

[misterbonkers]

Originally Posted by Encroaching Death [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just linked one about Olympia schools allowing that specific book in their schools.

You just don't click the links.

peculiar

i don't when i don't trust the source

and reading it now, it seems like they came to the conclusion that it wasn't obscene

how does this "promote grooming" more than matt gaetz?

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it wasn't being shown to children, it was being shown to teenagers. pay attention to the spin

teenagers are children

[Elizondo]

Attachment 20569Attachment 20570

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it wasn't obscene

What's the redeeming social importance of deepthroating a big ol dildo?

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

how does this "promote grooming" more than matt gaetz?

I'm not even arguing about it being 'grooming'.

I'm just asking that we shouldn't show literal dick sucking acts to children.

It's not even done in an educational way. It's just BAM: dick suckin.

I can't believe you're just so easy going about showing young children child porn.

Where do you draw the line? Serious question.

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What's the redeeming social importance of deepthroating a big ol dildo?

I wish I could make this quote my signature but it's occupied currently

[misterbonkers]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What's the redeeming social importance of deepthroating a big ol dildo?

shrug, it could do without it, probably, i won't argue against that, but to say it promotes grooming is hilarious at best, insidious at worst.

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

but to say it promotes grooming is hilarious at best, insidious at worst.

No one is saying that.

People just don't want child porn shown to children.

That is the exact opposite of 'insidious', you human trash.