******Official politics thread ******

[Throndor]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

law is pretty much arguing about morality, so let's call compromise and call it religious studies

he has a masters in Secularism

Not even close.

Law is arguing over the letter of the law (Textual Semantics). "Spirit of the Law" (Intent, and CONTEXTUAL semantics) is not legally enforceable and has nothing to do with the study of Law.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

religion IS law though. the idea of religious law being separable* from religion is wrongheaded. the religion itself is the law.

e:*

In that case, Law is STEM.

You have to engineer your case, email people with your technology computer, and count how many years in prison your client is looking at.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not even close.

Law is arguing over the letter of the law (Textual Semantics). "Spirit of the Law" (Intent, and CONTEXTUAL semantics) is not legally enforceable and has nothing to do with the study of Law.

seems tautological i like dinos post better

[Throndor]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politi...st_the_Machine

Remember when Leftists were ANTI-Establishment?

[Throndor]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

seems tautological i like dinos post better

Of course you do. You can actually argue against his posts. You have no choice but to concede to mine, lest you admit you're a fucking dolt.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Of course you do. You can actually argue against his posts. You have no choice but to concede to mine, lest you admit you're a fucking dolt.

dino is smarter than you my dude. you just know more words.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

dino is smarter than you my dude. you just know more words.

^ Don't fall for this divide and conquer tactic

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^ Don't fall for this divide and conquer tactic

q.e.d.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not even close.

Law is arguing over the letter of the law (Textual Semantics). "Spirit of the Law" (Intent, and CONTEXTUAL semantics) is not legally enforceable and has nothing to do with the study of Law.

this is resoundingly correct.

Your morals come from your inner self, from your community, from your family and friends. The law doesnt define your morals, nor should it. This is why.

If the law determined morality then you would look at laws to be a solution to moral problems and would thus make unjust rulings for a greater good. Like for example determining that certain behavior is prone to immorality and should be eliminated from society.

We all but removed that from politics between the 60's to the 90's and now you mellenial cucks are trying to reform religion *cough* I mean governance, to be based completely around it.

[Wonkie]

election season is here