Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 09-20-2018, 12:50 PM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
unimportant guilds like Taken.
hell truly hath no fury
  #162  
Old 09-20-2018, 01:15 PM
Ghostly Ghostly is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elerial [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I dont get it.

What difference does it make WHO logged on a Core tagged character during a raid ban and went to a raid zone?

If you are sharing your account, it has always been, always is and always will be the account owners responsibility if sonething untoward happens with the shared toons.

Solution is quite simple, either stop sharing accounts or share them with trusted people who wont fuck you up.

Lazy going to PoSky was a pretty dumb thing to do, all things considered. During a raid ban no less.
You are 100% correct. The account owner is 100% responsible for everyone who used their account and has the account info.

However, the guild should not be responsible for it. To extend the ban, and ultimately have that be a factor in every officer having their account suspended is ridiculous and abusive.
  #163  
Old 09-20-2018, 01:24 PM
Ghostly Ghostly is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Konfetti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The only difference is the guilds involved. Franswa didn’t ask for tempest to be punished, just that Core not be punished for an action of a member of the guild who’s petition got Core suspended in the first place.

Why tempest isn’t held accountable for any of their wrongdoings, you’ll have to ask the people that make those decisions...
Tempest isn't being held responsible because Core has stated that it was an honest mistake and that they weren't trying to get Core in trouble. Whether that's true or not is debatable.

I'm not sure why a Tempest member would log onto an account that had been inactive for over a month to play a toon that before they logged on they had assumed was Core tagged, just to go to Hate. Sounds sketchy to me, but maybe i'm just nefarious.
  #164  
Old 09-20-2018, 01:41 PM
Gimp Gimp is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 547
Default

So anyone got the DL on why Sirken really hates Core so much? Looks like a lot of precedence getting broken with these suspensions. I mean, the video from Getsome was easily not a kite and about as clean of a pull as you could hope for. Someone really pissed in his cheerios.
  #165  
Old 09-20-2018, 01:43 PM
kaev kaev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think it was 2 months before we could raid after the initial 30-day for Christmas. After our suspension, they raid suspended everyone till the abomination known as the class system was born from about a month of forced-at-gunpoint collaboration between people who absolutely hated each other, TMO, IB, BDA, and other unimportant guilds like Taken.
Those were the good old days!
  #166  
Old 09-20-2018, 01:43 PM
Elerial Elerial is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tesaria [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You are wrong and should look into the Hyjal v. Aftermath case. Staff did not blame the random Aftermath shaman and his account sharing. They blamed Hyjal for logging into the account and doing harm to a competitors guild.
I'm not a court litigator, so i don't *have* to look into anything. Besides, I'm not wrong.

All offenses are judged on a case by case basis. Staff rules at their discretion.
(Unless you've RMT'd, then you'll get a ban whether you earned 5$ or 5000swedish crowns)

I don't agree with suspending the entirety of Core's officers/leadership, but I didn't know about that until someone had pointed it out to me in private.
  #167  
Old 09-20-2018, 02:06 PM
Ella`Ella Ella`Ella is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tesaria [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You are wrong and should look into the Hyjal v. Aftermath case. Staff did not blame the random Aftermath shaman and his account sharing. They blamed Hyjal for logging into the account and doing harm to a competitors guild.
Aftermath had better legal counsel.
  #168  
Old 09-20-2018, 02:10 PM
Nexii Nexii is offline
Sarnak

Nexii's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Neriak Third Gate
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Aftermath had better legal counsel.
Is your retainer that high these days? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #169  
Old 09-20-2018, 03:04 PM
kjs86z kjs86z is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: St. Pete, FL
Posts: 1,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francois [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
wow
  #170  
Old 09-20-2018, 03:35 PM
branamil branamil is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 790
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francois [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Very discouraging if true
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.