Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-11-2016, 02:58 PM
big_ole_jpn big_ole_jpn is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 😘boysฏ๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎๎
Posts: 978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdastomper58 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
how much of the movie did you watch before determining your posts were needed to protect the children?
like I said, no real need to say anything as it flopped naturally. I was just explaining why I and apparently a decent proportion of consumers find the thang gross as fuck. u don't?
  #32  
Old 08-11-2016, 03:15 PM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Anyone watch the cartoon reboot?
__________________
  #33  
Old 08-11-2016, 03:44 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

this movie cant get its ass beat enough

keep it comin'

Paul Feig is an IDIOT
  #34  
Old 08-11-2016, 03:56 PM
Sage Truthbearer Sage Truthbearer is offline
Fire Giant

Sage Truthbearer's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 604
Default

I didn't see this movie because the trailer didn't look very funny and I'm tired of lazy reboots.

I didn't feel the need to have a huge emotional investment in the movie's financial outcome and I honestly don't give shit how attractive the actors are or aren't if it would've been a funny/good movie.
  #35  
Old 08-11-2016, 04:02 PM
NegaStoat NegaStoat is offline
Fire Giant

NegaStoat's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 780
Default

No surprise it flopped. The script writer and director could have made a reboot, with women, and had it work if they put some legitimate effort into the story and dialogue. Answering questions like "what things about the supernatural fascinates the different characters?", "what motivations do the characters have in developing / using technology to hunt and trap ghosts?", "why and how much will be borrowed or referenced from the first movie set?", "what story theme are we trying to get across to the viewers?", "what plot points and character moments will appeal to certain viewers that they will identify with?", and finally, "what 'hook' will work best in bringing the cast back for another sequel?"

But they didn't bother. They really didn't try at all to spend the hours necessary in answering some of those basic questions and how they would relate to each other when a final story was developed. It as just.... half assed crap. Movie viewers have seen GOOD films, including reboots, and can judge for themselves if something will be garbage rather than be threatened that they're being politically incorrect over something totally unrelated to movie quality.

Lastly, China makes up a HUGE number of viewers and revenue for films. They screwed up by not having an asian (Chinese would be best for max returns) lady as one of the four. China loves big explosions and CGI and stuff flying at them, but aren't big at all on black actors or a cast without an Asian to identify with. Just stating the obvious based on revenue facts.
  #36  
Old 08-11-2016, 05:39 PM
Maitresse Maitresse is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Default

Young Scientist man explains it perfectly!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc
  #37  
Old 08-11-2016, 06:06 PM
Chaboo_Cleric Chaboo_Cleric is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 757
Default

If this movie had Bill Murey and Dan Akroide it would've done well. Instead we got fat woman... Dude Ghostbusters was never meant to be a chick flick. This movie was rjw biggest joke I've seen yet. World of Warcraft had better casting. The fact they rebooted this series without the stars behind it , is beyond me.... I'm glad it flopped. I hate reboots of classic movies without the lead actors. Goood rid dance
  #38  
Old 08-11-2016, 06:25 PM
Laugher Laugher is offline
Fire Giant

Laugher's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 831
Send a message via AIM to Laugher
Default

Not surprised with the outcome of this one @ the box office, probably wouldn't have looked twice had it not been for the lolzy Youtube trailer situation
__________________
Freddi
Farson
  #39  
Old 08-11-2016, 06:50 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaboo_Cleric [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If this movie had Bill Murey and Dan Akroide it would've done well. Instead we got fat woman... Dude Ghostbusters was never meant to be a chick flick. This movie was rjw biggest joke I've seen yet. World of Warcraft had better casting. The fact they rebooted this series without the stars behind it , is beyond me.... I'm glad it flopped. I hate reboots of classic movies without the lead actors. Goood rid dance
Dan made several total cuck comments as well

Hope he enjoys the tarnish on the brand

Poor Bill tho
  #40  
Old 08-11-2016, 07:45 PM
AzzarTheGod AzzarTheGod is offline
Planar Protector

AzzarTheGod's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Sullon Zek
Posts: 7,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Computer Man [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think it did as well as could be expected given the bad concept. Imagine a remake of Charlie's Angels with all guys - think that would be a big money maker?
So why do it? That's the question right now in regards to affirmative action.

Why empty investors pockets who worked hard for their money their entire lives? Did you think money is just printed?

Should the SJW effect excuse the studio and director from losing hundreds of millions of dollars out of the US economy? That money could have gone to something more enriching.

I see your thinking is very narrow here.
__________________
Kirban Manaburn / Speedd Haxx

PKer & Master Trainer and Terrorist of Sullon Zek
Kills: 1278, Deaths: 76, Killratio: 16.82
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.