Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs > Velious Beta > NPC Bugs

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-16-2015, 03:28 PM
Daldaen Daldaen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 9,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troubled [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Dunno they didn't like ppl using the VP ledge. If they added non-classic roaming drakes to remove safe spots they might make a ruling on that ledge eventually, too.
They didn't like raids pulling Dragons up there I thought was the ruling? Not that you couldn't park a tracker up there. Because it negates the need for you to have to contest with trash mobs, though this was way back when we had absolutely 100% retarded invis and sneak pulling done.

I don't see that ledge as being much different from the bell towers in fear though. High up on Z Axis to avoid aggro. I'd guess the main difference being you can CotH in an FTEer who can eat a gate potion or TL box and intitated a pull.

If Nilbog and Rogean and Alunova find the evidence compelling enough to remove binding in ToV, I don't see this presenting a large issue at all though.

If they don't, I suppose Sirken and Rogean can make whatever ruling they want on it. But this is the bug forum, not the raid rules forum. Mechanically, as far as I can tell, that ledge shouldn't be in LoS aggro of anything and it is feasible to get up there using legitimate means during the classic era.
Last edited by Daldaen; 12-16-2015 at 03:30 PM..
  #32  
Old 12-17-2015, 02:55 AM
Moosetoe Moosetoe is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If Nilbog and Rogean and Alunova find the evidence compelling enough to remove binding in ToV, I don't see this presenting a large issue at all though.

If they don't, I suppose Sirken and Rogean can make whatever ruling they want on it. But this is the bug forum, not the raid rules forum.
Right. I just wanted to have some staff response of some sort, because there has yet to be any from what I can tell. These post-Velious/Luclin-era drakes are pretty straightforwardly not of this era. Considering all the other BS that is in contention for "is it classic or not," this should be one of the easier determinations to make.
  #33  
Old 12-21-2015, 06:47 AM
Moosetoe Moosetoe is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 134
Default

http://www.tski.co.jp/baldio/patch/20011218.html
^ [December 18, 2001 patch notes] referencing upcoming patch to implement these non-classic mobs

http://www.tski.co.jp/baldio/patch/20011228.html
^ [December 28, 2001 patch notes] patch 10 days later that implemented aforementioned non-classic mobs

NOTE: The Shadows of Luclin was released December 4, 2001.
NOTE: The Velious era came before The Shadows of Luclin era.
NOTE: We are currently in the Velious era.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.