#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
Last edited by DiogenesThaDogg; 05-13-2019 at 01:59 AM..
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#13
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
Last edited by DiogenesThaDogg; 05-13-2019 at 09:08 AM..
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
No item no plat. Seller really should assume risk. The pay half thing seems rubbish.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx View Post I tried my hand at rotating with the casuals. It was at this point I decided to no longer be kind to the casuals as they have extreme short term memory. They did this to themselves, unfortunately. Quote: Originally Posted by Maner View Post No one in A/A cares that you aren't getting pixels. In fact after the last suspension wave the attitude is to stop letting the casual guilds get anything even remotely of value. | ||
|
#16
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#17
|
|||
|
As a common seller of MQs I tend to trust a buyer if the character is high level and / or from an established guild, even if the item is going to an alt. I’m always clear on the instructions have the buyer trigger responses where applicable or verify faction where relevant. Happy to say I’ve not had a failed MQ yet but in the case where it’s previous turn in to blame I would eat the loss and move on.
When the buyer is low level I ask for payment in advance, but would refund if it’s clear the failure was due to previous turn in. Basically if you are selling, you should be informed on all the factors of the quest and prepare the buyer. If the MQ fails due to outside circumstances I would assume the seller takes the risk. | ||
|
#18
|
|||
|
There is no etiquette, if for no other reason than the the staff will not reimburse and hence doesn't endorse MQing. Logically, whoever is assuming the risk should be getting a better deal if successful, but it's all up to you to suss out.
| ||
|
#19
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#20
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|