Is it messed up to leave your group to join another group

[Sweagen]

While U are waiting for your previous group members to do a Corpse Recovery?? and then rejoin them later once they're finished?

I'm new to the server so still figuring out what is and isn't acceptable etiquette, lol

[Infectious]

Originally Posted by Sweagen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

While U are waiting for your previous group members to do a Corpse Recovery?? and then rejoin them later once they're finished?

I'm new to the server so still figuring out what is and isn't acceptable etiquette, lol

Perfect etiquette. If the experience is better, don't even go back. If they send tells , just /ignore them.

[Toxigen]

leave the bad group, join the good group, then go pull bad groups mobs they're unable to keep up with

[Encroaching Death]

If it feels bad, do it.

[Toxigen]

should just be FFA in xp zones anyway

enc be god tier pullers w/ tash ripping off mobs from other camps

[Berb]

Depends on the individuals in the group, and the context of the wipe/recovery. If they invited you back it doesn't seem like it was a problem. If they didn't invite you back...probably should have helped them recover if you wanted to be in the group.

You're gonna burn some bridges in EQ, up to you to decide which ones are worth burning.

[Toxigen]

Originally Posted by Berb [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're gonna burn some bridges in EQ, up to you to decide which ones are worth burning.

The likelihood of any given bridge being burnable is directly proportional to your time spent on P99.

[Berb]

Which way does that likelihood go - play more, more bridges burnable? Or play more, best to burn fewer bridges? I could see either read of that being correct depending on circumstances.

[Allishia]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

should just be FFA in xp zones anyway

enc be god tier pullers w/ tash ripping off mobs from other camps

Tash is like zero agro now, would have to use slow...maybe cripple. But tash they do that on inc now lol

[Toxigen]

Originally Posted by Berb [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Which way does that likelihood go - play more, more bridges burnable? Or play more, best to burn fewer bridges? I could see either read of that being correct depending on circumstances.

figure out what directly proportional means and you'll know