Court blocks equality law.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It really looks like you have the laughable argument.

1. The conversations isn't that twitter should be forced to host conservatives. The discussion is on free speech. And twitter can ban you for your tweets if they deemed extreme or dangerous misinformation. Something conservative just happen to be guilty on the platform of.

2. Twitter and Facebook are havens for the conservatives.

3. Twitter the private business has guidelines and if you break them you are banned. It is as simple as that.

Your analogy is was just flawed.

No, no, wrong. Read my above reply to jib. I didn't say they can't ban anyone, but sec 230 requires them to apply their editing in good faith and in an unbiased way, which they demonstrably do not.

What is considered "extreme" is just determined by some activist. They consider a benign tweet about election irregularities to be "extremism", BOOM that guy is banned!

Meanwhile antifa and blm literally organized dozens and dozens or riots using these platforms, and the vast majority of accounts have not been banned. This is clearly not a fair, good faith and unbiased application of their policies. It is clearly curated, which makes them a publisher. This is the *entire* issue.

It always just comes down to slimeball lawyerese whenever the left tries to pretend these companies don't stifle conservatives. Oh look guys, they THRIVE on facebook and twitter! Lol what? Why? Because they haven't *all* been banned?

[Homesteaded]

Bring this to America and you will get results. This is what we need and this is what's coming as a response to this far left lunacy we've all been going along with for far too long.

https://youtu.be/k8IGBDK1BH8

[Jibartik]

This video is in a strange unknown language...

Edit: gonna quote this over in end times lol

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Should we not consider every possible option that might help? Why oppose this drug?

Diuretics and laxatives are contraindicated during most illnesses due to the danger of dehydration.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Diuretics and laxatives are advised against during most illnesses due to the danger of dehydration.

It's not either of those things though? It's an antiparasitic, that also seems to demonstrate antiviral properties based on current research.

The point is that it's extremely bizarre and weird that the left hates this random chemical so much. It's just so obviously political. Perfectly legitimate, good science is telling us this is a safe and effective treatment for some people who are sick with covid.

Who. Cares?? Why does everyone have such a hate boner for this drug? Because hur hurr horse medicine?

"Oh man you're taking Advil for a headache?!?! Lol! My vet gave a huge dose of Advil to a horse to relieve arthritis inflammation! So you're taking horse medicine!!" -an idiot.

[Nocht]

Posting in a mad libtard thread.

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not either of those things though? It's an antiparasitic, that also seems to demonstrate antiviral properties based on current research.

The point is that it's extremely bizarre and weird that the left hates this random chemical so much. It's just so obviously political. Perfectly legitimate, good science is telling us this is a safe and effective treatment for some people who are sick with covid.

Who. Cares?? Why does everyone have such a hate boner for this drug? Because hur hurr horse medicine?

"Oh man you're taking Advil for a headache?!?! Lol! My vet gave a huge dose of Advil to a horse to relieve arthritis inflammation! So you're taking horse medicine!!" -an idiot.

The worms gotta go somewhere, dude. Think about it and light a match after plz.

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thanks for your lawerly expertise but it's almost as if people's entire point here is that these specific companies, the influence they weild, and their ability to legitimately steer elections is extremely new and unprecedented, and may require *updated* or *new* legislation to address these concerns.

You just happen to like the direction the censorship tends to go, so you get all regressive and actually kind of conservative and go "nuh uh, seee, that's the way it goes, that's the law, no updates needed, private company, nahhh nahhh!"

Private companies used to be able to deny people access to their services because they were black. Then that became illegal, because the law was updated.

Maybe stop defunding your schools and you'll stop getting banned. Its more of a read comprehension problem than a left v right problem.

YOU'RE NOT BEING DENIED SERVICE.
Stop making shit up.
You AGREED to their terms.
You cant get banned if you follow the rules.

So if you sew your own mouth shut you can sue a needle and threat company too right? Remember, you're the one who got yourself banned. You have to use the service FIRST before you can be banned. I cant help it if your political party lacks self control, discipline, and the ability to distinguish reality from fiction.


Comparing conservatives posting crazy shit online to the plight of black people in america pre civil rights act is just insane.

You dont have the RIGHT to use someone else' platform to spread your bullshit especially when you agreed in the TOS to not do that.


You can tell they have touched nerves. See how they all flew off the handle? Cause they are banned on social media. lol

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The worms gotta go somewhere, dude. Think about it and light a match after plz.

Yes, you shit them out your asshole. That doesn't make the drug a diuretic.

Benadryl is marketed as both a sleep aid and an anti-histamine for allergies. Drugs can have multiple legitimate uses in humans, because chemistry is complex.

But then they call the right "anti-scientific" while exhibiting absolutely no skepticism about their own positions. Which is the definition of anti-scientific. Arrogant self-assured narcissism is the enemy of science.

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe stop defunding your schools and you'll stop getting banned. Its more of a read comprehension problem than a left v right problem.

YOU'RE NOT BEING DENIED SERVICE.
Stop making shit up.
You AGREED to their terms.
You cant get banned if you follow the rules.

So if you sew your own mouth shut you can sue a needle and threat company too right? Remember, you're the one who got yourself banned. You have to use the service FIRST before you can be banned. I cant help it if your political party lacks self control, discipline, and the ability to distinguish reality from fiction.


Comparing conservatives posting crazy shit online to the plight of black people in america pre civil rights act is just insane.

You dont have the RIGHT to use someone else' platform to spread your bullshit especially when you agreed in the TOS to not do that.


You can tell they have touched nerves. See how they all flew off the handle? Cause they are banned on social media. lol

I like the part where this section 230 bullcrap got dunked on and lost in Alito's home circuit and they come here acting like we're the unreasonable maniacs.