I keep hearing how Iksar are the master race

[Rader]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Iksars are for weak bad players that need to compensate for being weak and bad.

Whenever I see an iksar monk or necro, I automatically assume they are inferior players and am on guard for them making stupid decisions in game

[Naethyn]

Ogre warriors too.

[SantagarBrax]

Iksar necros are supremely more durable and badass than gnome/de/humans.

You don't have to constantly watch your lich if you get into trouble like those other races do. With ring 10 and x2 aob items, you won't lose hp's at all with demi lich on and sitting.

It's a no brainer.

[Gustoo]

Rader and people like him are just wanting to feel better about not min/maxing which I support.

Of all the class / race combos the iksar necro and the iksar monk are the most supremely superior to all other alternatives that it is basically not fair and I wish they weren't in the game.

Ogre you at least have the drawback of being a big fat turdball. Plus you could argue for min maxing that someone with more agi and dex makes more sense since the ogre stats are pegged way past 255 on a warrior for str and sta.

Iksar necro and monk basically no drawbacks.

[BlackBellamy]

Originally Posted by Gugg [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A master race which has no...etc...etc...etc

Sorry you feel bad looking at your ugly character model. When you run, do your arms go all stiff and stupid looking? Do your legs look like they're powering a floating barrel? When you crouch do you look like you have spina bifida?

None of these things can be fixed with armor or equipment upgrades. You can waddle into the crowd and start reminding people about your frontal stun or how great your fancy spells are, but you're just an unattractive loser begging for some attention.

Good-looking people play Iksar. The rest come up with nerdtastic lists of why people should have sex with them.

[reznor_]

Originally Posted by Chortles Snortles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[IMG] dragon which requires 40 people to kill

<20*

[Toxigen]

Name a more powerful "starting naked with nothing" trio than Iksar necro, Iksar monk, and Iksar shaman.

You can't.

[Gustoo]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Name a more powerful "starting naked with nothing" trio than Iksar necro, Iksar monk, and Iksar shaman.

You can't.

I'd put them against an Ogre Warrior, SK, and Shaman group. With supreme base stats for the warrior and the SK, I think they could probably compare favorably to level 30 despite the disadvantage of only one hi-mana-regen spell caster in the group.

Once mobs get too tough the efficiency of 2 caster classes vs 2 melee classes will probably win out.

[Triode]

Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For monks and necromancers it is a no brainer as there are no drawbacks at all in those cases except hated faction.

You misspelled fashion. Fungi's look like absolute dogshit on Iksars, and shrouds are obviously dead and gone. Thus, human is the only correct choice for a monk that you are going to spend hundreds/thousands of hours looking at.

[Gustoo]

Fashion is purely subjective, everyone looks equally shit with the fungi on, that is the glory of the fungi.