worst class in classic

[Wrekt]

Originally Posted by Wrekt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't wear glasses, you fucking nerd.

[Madbad]

Originally Posted by Wrekt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't wear glasses, you fucking nerd.

[Asteria]

Originally Posted by Wrekt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just let the hybrids die. While they're on a corpse run, experience will be better.

All jokes aside, I don't have a huge problem with inviting a hybrid, like only one. But it's rich when they start barking orders trying to make things run more efficiently. Like, bitch, you nerfed your experience gains by choosing high elf paladin. Don't suddenly get overly concerned with efficiency now!

Originally Posted by Wrekt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't wear glasses, you fucking nerd.

You: [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Natewest1987]

Originally Posted by Tenderizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A higher level charecter steals way more xp from the group than an average level hybrid. Plus, I'm pretty sure the calc for group distro is level based and then the hybrids take their xp cut after the group is given their xp. so yes, if you have even a rogue 4 levels higher than everyone else in group they will steal more xp from the group than a hybrid of equal level.



penalty doesnt matter as much as you think, see above.
snare,levi,invis,root,harmony, and the many other lower level but still useful spells that can stack in some groups.

low damage? subjective, ranger with cof would do more damage than most others that have lesser haste/gear. the idea that if its not meta its not worth it permeates this server.

Ranger can tank very well in classic up to 40-45 with minimal gear and do fine. higher tier mobs are reserved for tanks' duh.

There are no bad classes, only bad players and meta fags

A high level rogue only has one way to fuck your xp. A high level hybrid has two. People keep comparing these variables like they’re of equal weight but they’re not. If equal levels, then a hybrid is still going to screw your group over more than a rogue would.

[Tenderizer]

:-)

[Wrekt]

Originally Posted by Natewest1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A high level rogue only has one way to fuck your xp. A high level hybrid has two. People keep comparing these variables like they’re of equal weight but they’re not. If equal levels, then a hybrid is still going to screw your group over more than a rogue would.

Yep. Playing a hybrid before velious is extremely inconsiderate if you group. Don't make your poor decision my problem.

[gherron]

Originally Posted by Wrekt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yep. Playing a hybrid before velious is extremely inconsiderate if you group. Don't make your poor decision my problem.

Yeah but are you really banning all hybrids from your groups?

[Thulghor]

Sure is a lot of hybrid hate in this thread.

Anyhow, I was going to say warrior, as it bites cock to tank for groups in classic with crap like gnoll hide lariats and obsidian shards, but paladin and ranger definitely aren't doing great in this era either. I got a good laugh out of rogue as a suggestion. For a class that sucks, they sure seem popular. Can't turn a corner on blue or green without bumping into someone's rogue twink.

[Wallicker]

I generally get zero flack as hybrid being a bard.

[solleks]

Good pickup groups are all about the idiot/normie/beard sliding scale. If a ranger wants to join your pug there is high likely hood of them being an idiot. It's not 100% but it's close.