Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:29 AM
Smilkers Smilkers is offline
Kobold

Smilkers's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purist 4.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
stormlord you know nobody reads your long-winded posts right?
dawww, Stormlord is just trying to help. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
keep on keepin' on, SL.
__________________
Smilkers Goodbuddy
[60 Hoobit Druid] <Asgard> - magelo link
  #42  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:36 AM
Nalanthius Nalanthius is offline
Orc


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 34
Default

It's jealousy, we duel wield weapons and shoot fireballs when were bored.
  #43  
Old 01-11-2013, 01:39 AM
Cippofra Cippofra is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 365
Default

Dont understand why people think a ranger's dps is similar to a monk's, or "a tad below" as many people are saying. In my opinion, this is utter BS. And hold back on the trolling, I dont care, it's my opinion, not yours, and I won't be back to this thread to hear any crying. As far as groups go I don't see a need to ever have a ranger (other than tracking). To me a ranger is just for snare. Which a druid can do as well as back up heals, and utility. Necros and bards are the "swiss army knife". Rangers are just the last choice, with wizards coming in a close second.

That being said, if you want to play a ranger, and you enjoy being a ranger, what's it matter what anyone else thinks? As useless as rangers are, I would gladly group with 5 good rangers over the average melee classes that fumble, pull while the puller is pulling, runs ahead of the puller to look around, casters that are AFK 95% of the time and monks that use cool weapons rather than the higher dps weapons that are half the cost. These forums are nothing but a poisonous outlet for children to cry, brag, and bicker (you'll see this in the responses I get to my post). Just play the game and enjoy.
Last edited by Cippofra; 01-11-2013 at 01:49 AM..
  #44  
Old 01-11-2013, 04:25 AM
gotrocks gotrocks is offline
Planar Protector

gotrocks's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cippofra [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Dont understand why people think a ranger's dps is similar to a monk's, or "a tad below" as many people are saying. In my opinion, this is utter BS. And hold back on the trolling, I dont care, it's my opinion, not yours, and I won't be back to this thread to hear any crying. As far as groups go I don't see a need to ever have a ranger (other than tracking). To me a ranger is just for snare. Which a druid can do as well as back up heals, and utility. Necros and bards are the "swiss army knife". Rangers are just the last choice, with wizards coming in a close second.

That being said, if you want to play a ranger, and you enjoy being a ranger, what's it matter what anyone else thinks? As useless as rangers are, I would gladly group with 5 good rangers over the average melee classes that fumble, pull while the puller is pulling, runs ahead of the puller to look around, casters that are AFK 95% of the time and monks that use cool weapons rather than the higher dps weapons that are half the cost. These forums are nothing but a poisonous outlet for children to cry, brag, and bicker (you'll see this in the responses I get to my post). Just play the game and enjoy.

agree with almost everything you said.

especially the dps thing. rangers are not "a tad below" monks/rogues.
  #45  
Old 01-11-2013, 05:40 AM
ArumTP ArumTP is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 402
Default

Ranger DPS is just a bit lower or close to Warrior DPS. Given that all their melee caps are lower than a warrior.
__________________
Arum Cleric
Ticklebottom Warrior
Servilius Rogue
  #46  
Old 01-11-2013, 06:21 AM
Scratch&Sniff Scratch&Sniff is offline
Kobold

Scratch&Sniff's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The Waste
Posts: 175
Default

/GU The Spiroc Lord in 92s, 24k @266dps --- Brennard - 4k @45dps (16.24%) --- Wanyo 3k @41dps (13.33%) --- Brainz 3k @37dps (12.17%) --- Smedy 3k @28dps (10.32%) --- Vabann 2k @24dps (8.54%) --- Jantik 2k @32dps (8.09%) --- Ezpk 2k @49dps (6.96%) --- Xintao 2k @19dps (6.84%) --- Bronkar 1k @19dps (5.75%) --- Maximilien 1k @30dps (4.31%)

Brennard 60 rogue

Wanyo /smedy 55+ monks

Brainz - 59 ranger + 3 castings of Calefaction for 1500ish dmg

Ezpk 60 war
__________________

<Grunny Swampskin>Retired
<Brennard>Retired
<Alton> Retired
<Vizuni>
  #47  
Old 01-11-2013, 08:11 AM
ArumTP ArumTP is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 402
Default

Ill bite.
Was Ezpk the main tank and using defensive?
__________________
Arum Cleric
Ticklebottom Warrior
Servilius Rogue
  #48  
Old 01-11-2013, 10:32 AM
Elements Elements is offline
Fire Giant

Elements's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch&Sniff [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
/GU The Spiroc Lord in 92s, 24k @266dps --- Brennard - 4k @45dps (16.24%) --- Wanyo 3k @41dps (13.33%) --- Brainz 3k @37dps (12.17%) --- Smedy 3k @28dps (10.32%) --- Vabann 2k @24dps (8.54%) --- Jantik 2k @32dps (8.09%) --- Ezpk 2k @49dps (6.96%) --- Xintao 2k @19dps (6.84%) --- Bronkar 1k @19dps (5.75%) --- Maximilien 1k @30dps (4.31%)

Brennard 60 rogue

Wanyo /smedy 55+ monks

Brainz - 59 ranger + 3 castings of Calefaction for 1500ish dmg

Ezpk 60 war
Was the warrior tanking? Was he using dps weapons or agro weapons? What buffs/gear/stat caps? Did anyonedisc? Was the war in zerker? What weapons were the ranger and warrior using? Was the warrior hitting from the back? Was everyone haste capped?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.