Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2012, 03:27 PM
mazukon mazukon is offline
Orc


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 38
Default Low Health Aggro

This just happened and by my memory defies all aggro-logic in EQ:

Player A pulls a kos, social mob. Another one of the same kind adds on him. Player B pulls off the add. We now have Player A with Mob A, and Player B with Mob B. They each fight seperately (but nearby each other).

Player B gets extremely low on health (~10%) and Mob A completely ignores Player A and charges Player B until death (despite Player B having 0 damage on Mob A).

This shouldn't happen.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2012, 03:43 PM
Zeelot Zeelot is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 625
Default

If both NPCs share the same faction then there is assist social aggro from both NPCs on both players. Low hp aggro is classic too
__________________
Zeelot <TMO>
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2012, 03:43 PM
Ele Ele is offline
Planar Protector

Ele's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mazukon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This just happened and by my memory defies all aggro-logic in EQ:

Player A pulls a kos, social mob. Another one of the same kind adds on him. Player B pulls off the add. We now have Player A with Mob A, and Player B with Mob B. They each fight seperately (but nearby each other).

Player B gets extremely low on health (~10%) and Mob A completely ignores Player A and charges Player B until death (despite Player B having 0 damage on Mob A).

This shouldn't happen.
If Mob A and Mob B are close enough to each other when Player B tags Mob B, then Player B will be on both Mob A and Mob B's aggro lists. Both will monitor for low hp aggro, even if Player B did nothing affirmative to Mob A.

What in your opinion should happen? Mob A shouldn't have any aggro on Player B?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2012, 06:33 PM
mazukon mazukon is offline
Orc


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 38
Default

Sorry I didn't know about this. So, no matter what, under any circumstance, if you get low on health any mob that you're on their aggro table will come attack you?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-2012, 08:10 PM
Ele Ele is offline
Planar Protector

Ele's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mazukon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sorry I didn't know about this. So, no matter what, under any circumstance, if you get low on health any mob that you're on their aggro table will come attack you?
Yes, unless someone else is higher on the aggro table and they also have low hp.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-23-2013, 11:03 AM
leezard leezard is offline
Aviak

leezard's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 90
Default

Ok I have a related question/issue with the low level aggro aspect brought up here.

I was duo'ing with a warrior inFoB with my lowb monk, and we ended up with a pretty mean skeleton. The warrior was about 2 or 3 levels higher I think, but still was getting chewed up. At about 25% health ( on this warrior, not mob ) I switched from my slow 2hb to dual wield my trance stick / cane of harmony, which I had noticed produced more aggro, as well as a fair boost in dps. Knowing it was most likely too late, I continued to pound the skelly as there was no way the warrior could run it off. Then something strange happened....

At about 3% health left on the warrior I was grouped with, I pulled aggro off him. I was shocked but grateful, as this meant he did not die. We finished the mob off and bandaged up etc. But I cannot understand how I managed to pull the aggro away in the first place.

I had been managing my aggro, periodically stopping auto attack when I pulled hate because, as I said, the warrior was higher level and the skelly eas a low red con to me. But I thougt low health aggro should have made the skeleton stick on the warrior? I was probably ariound 80% health so I dont see how I peeled aggo. I always thought low health pretty much guaranteed aggro if you were on hate list at all. Should this have happened?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-23-2013, 11:28 AM
theaetatus theaetatus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 265
Default

It sounds as if someone may have rooted the mob without you noticing.
__________________
Wazzock - Ogre Warrior
Pillock - Iksar Monk
Urgh - Troll Shadowknight
Twerp - Ogre Shaman
Numpty - Halfling Warrior
Tosser - Gnome Enchanter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-23-2013, 03:41 PM
Furme Furme is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 65
Default

Actually, Low hp aggro doesn't apply to mobs below level 20.

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=65750
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-23-2013, 04:17 PM
leezard leezard is offline
Aviak

leezard's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 90
Default

Ah well that would explain it. The skelly was likely around level 16 or so.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.