Kriot wants even more charity pixels?

[Croco]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lull pulling is against the rules. Just because you don't wish to accept it doesn't magically make it not against the rules. It's been quoted to you where it's against the rules. Time to pick a different hill to die on.

Can you quote me the rule where it's not allowed? Still waiting. Thanks!

[Ripqozko]

I suggest using vp cancel magic stick for dain then, have fun.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Croco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can you quote me the rule where it's not allowed? Still waiting. Thanks!

It was quoted to you on the previous page.

Jesus fucking christ, you're dense.

[Croco]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It was quoted to you on the previous page.

Jesus fucking christ, you're dense.

Sirken removed that rule and it's not listed in the server raid rules. Also that rule was specific to Kael.

Hope this helps.

[Bardp1999]

And Galach reinstated them right there at the bottom of the thread. Lull pulling through wall is against the rules dummy

[Croco]

Originally Posted by Bardp1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And Galach reinstated them right there at the bottom of the thread. Lull pulling through wall is against the rules dummy

Wrong. Those are new rules, and again no mention of lull. Not against the rules. Not listed in the server raid rules.

Originally Posted by Galach

New specific rules for Statue/AOW & King Tormax

[Grumph]

Originally Posted by Croco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wrong. Those are new rules, and again no mention of lull. Not against the rules. Not listed in the server raid rules.

Precedent of getting banned for using lull to pull solo/group content is very well established.

But if you want to be a bitter clinger to your “actually!” position, more power to ya brother!

[Croco]

Originally Posted by Grumph [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Precedent of getting banned for using lull to pull solo/group content is very well established.

But if you want to be a bitter clinger to your “actually!” position, more power to ya brother!

Not against the rules. You all are the ones bitterly clinging to the "REEEEE riot lulled dain!!!! REEEEEE!". We didn't get in trouble for that btw. You know because it's not against the rules.

[Bardp1999]

Sirkens post was to clarify the staffs stance not to institute a new rule

"This goes against the entire spirit, and purpose of why the rules exist. Continuing to do this will result in a raid suspension for your guild."

Doesn't seem very "open to interpretation"

[Nexii]

Originally Posted by Grumph [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Precedent of getting banned for using lull to pull solo/group content is very well established.

But if you want to be a bitter clinger to your “actually!” position, more power to ya brother!

Lol precedent means nothing. Only your guild thinks this way. "Well, Riot didn't petition us training them one time so the precedent is training is legal".