Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:25 PM
Gravydoo II Gravydoo II is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 2,375
Default Court blocks equality law.

https://www.statesman.com/story/news...on/8833124002/

Ouch, look what texas calls "equality". Forcing companies to carry your extremist, racist, sexist, or terroristic view points is not "equality" its compelling speech.

Where are all the free speech warriors..? Weird how the GOP wants to force companies like FB, twitter, and instagram to carry their message but they didnt include companies like parlor and gab. Those companies would be allowed to moderate user content, but not the bigger ones they NEED to spread their message on.

So glad a judge blocked it. Its basically saying that companies have no right to moderate content by users, especially if its hateful or recruiting for a jan 6th style attack on the USA.
  #2  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:33 PM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
https://www.statesman.com/story/news...on/8833124002/

Ouch, look what texas calls "equality". Forcing companies to carry your extremist, racist, sexist, or terroristic view points is not "equality" its compelling speech.

Where are all the free speech warriors..? Weird how the GOP wants to force companies like FB, twitter, and instagram to carry their message but they didnt include companies like parlor and gab. Those companies would be allowed to moderate user content, but not the bigger ones they NEED to spread their message on.

So glad a judge blocked it. Its basically saying that companies have no right to moderate content by users, especially if its hateful or recruiting for a jan 6th style attack on the USA.
Ya, the problem with moderation is that it is 100% completely necessary on any medium that has online communication

I remember hearing about Trump talking about his new social media platform and him touting that it will involve 100% free speech. I don’t know what ended up happening with that but it’s like “100% free speech huh? So what happens when thousands of trolls come in and start spamming ‘FUCK TRUMP’ thousands of times? Or the N word? Or any other pointless obscenities”. Anyone who thinks they can have a platform with unmoderated speech that WON’T turn into a haven for trolls and filth is just naive

But moderation cannot be impartial. It just can’t. It’s being done by humans, or it’s being done by algorithms programmed by humans, and humans are biased. So moderation will always be unfair to some group or another
  #3  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:34 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
https://www.statesman.com/story/news...on/8833124002/

Ouch, look what texas calls "equality". Forcing companies to carry your extremist, racist, sexist, or terroristic view points is not "equality" its compelling speech.
Damn, people have to just accept that getting vaccinated is the only way that I will be safe. I hope that the feds can overturn this and make sure that they do the vaccine mandates that we need.

I dont know why gravy is so happy that people can dodge the jab.
  #4  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:34 PM
starkind starkind is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 6,357
Default

laws wont fix whats wrong with us

laws are often not enforced

relying on law enforcement too much or the federal government too much creates a systemic problem and exacerbates racism and sexism and religious fanaticism. It removes the individuals ability to solve these problems on their own.
  #5  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:37 PM
BlackBellamy BlackBellamy is offline
Planar Protector

BlackBellamy's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: At the barricades.
Posts: 2,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Its basically saying that companies have no right to moderate content by users, especially if its hateful or recruiting for a jan 6th style attack on the USA.
some companies don't have that right

for example the cable company

the phone company

verizon doesn't have the right to moderate your content

so some do and some don't, and when there are disagreements we use the courts to sort it out

like it happened

it shouldn't be news that politicians carve out exemptions for their favorite constituency, this sort of corruption is endemic to all political parties
  #6  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:38 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

I cant believe all this anti vax hooey. Shame on OP.

Accept the mandates. Take the jab.
  #7  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:45 PM
Whale biologist Whale biologist is offline
Planar Protector

Whale biologist's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,359
Default

I doubt they ever meant it to take effect, just jerking off the base with nonsense about fairness. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #8  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:46 PM
Castle2.0 Castle2.0 is offline
Planar Protector

Castle2.0's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Default

Gravypoop,

Go learn what Section 230 is and how it is abused by social media companies.

Beyond what is legally required to be removed such as threats of violence, planning terrorist acts, snuff videos, child porn, etc.

Any further moderation or editorializing of content is beyond the scope a "platform"

You either DO NOT editorialize and you have Section 230 protection

OR

You DO editorialize and you are responsible for ALL content on your platform.

Social media has wanted it both ways. This will come to an end, maybe when (R) take the house in 2022.
  • Do you know what Section 230 is?
  • Have you read the law?
  • Do you know what content is and what content isn't legally required of platforms to remove?

Jeez, another ignorant lib.
  #9  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:50 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

All I know is if you want a job, you better get the jab.

I hope the feds can overturn whatever antivax shenanigan's in OP's link I didnt click on this court pulled, this is absurd.
  #10  
Old 12-03-2021, 12:50 PM
Whale biologist Whale biologist is offline
Planar Protector

Whale biologist's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Gravypoop,

Go learn what Section 230 is and how it is abused by social media companies.

Beyond what is legally required to be removed such as threats of violence, planning terrorist acts, snuff videos, child porn, etc.

Any further moderation or editorializing of content is beyond the scope a "platform"

You either DO NOT editorialize and you have Section 230 protection

OR

You DO editorialize and you are responsible for ALL content on your platform.

Social media has wanted it both ways. This will come to an end, maybe when (R) take the house in 2022.
  • Do you know what Section 230 is?
  • Have you read the law?
  • Do you know what content is and what content isn't legally required of platforms to remove?

Jeez, another ignorant lib.
Nationalizing Twitter to own the Left. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.