#121
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#122
|
|||
|
Always an interesting topic that I wish I had more time to research on my own. IMO, I don't think it would be as complicated as many think to stop P99. I see P99 as a derivative piece of work with the sole function of imitating a copyrighted piece of IP. I don't think a court would have a hard time coming to that line of thought if pushed to it. I'm not up on all the latest rulings on how the courts view code, though. I'm looking at it more as a piece of art as a whole. They could easily argue damages despite P99 not being for profit.
At the same time I'm also not sure it isn't better for business than not to have P99 around. I'm fairly certain I wouldn't have known or signed up for Aradune and leveled two toons to 60 if I wasn't already on the P99 hook. So, mostly because of people on P99 making me aware that Aradune was happening, Daybreak gained 2 subs. I'm sure I'm not the only one in that boat. /shrug As far as the agreement with P99 staying valid, it will be up to the discretion of the new owner either way. There's a lot of factors in the sale that could affect it, but even if the new owner assumed the agreement there's nothing (that we publicly know of) that could stop them from ending or renegotiating the agreement if they have the rights to the IP. | ||
|
#123
|
||||
|
Quote:
(ps: the server code was retrievable from Al'Kabor until very late and I have a pet theory that it was taken, however it's only TAKP which has netcode so good as to make me suspicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] mob and item database, however, tingles my tinfoil) | |||
Last edited by imperiouskitten; 12-03-2020 at 07:30 PM..
|
|
#124
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#125
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#126
|
|||
|
This is an interesting subject. I only know of copywrite law from watching it in action in other forms of entertainment but...…
Loramin- Let's say you have 2 entertainers. By some crazy chance they use the same name and the same act. If 1 trademarks it and the other keeps doing it, isn't it infringement of copywrite? Despite the idea that they were independently created? Who owns the everquest IP? You think daybreak won't be able to argue in court that p99 has created a bootleg copy of daybreaks IP despite the fact that a lot of it was independently created? Why I think the new investors may be forced to act is that I know IP law is very much "defend it or lose it". Like if daybreak doesn't defend their IP in court, they are liable to lose it completely and have 100s of EQemus for profit out there and they won't be able to do anything. | ||
|
#127
|
|||
|
This forum was much more fun before they cleaned it up for daybreak though
| ||
|
#128
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#129
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#130
|
||||
|
Quote:
I agree with ya. When a company acquires another the first thing they want to do is min max profits something most of us here on eq are familiar with. | |||
|
|
|