Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

View Poll Results: Which do you prefer?
Azure Guard's proposal 79 37.44%
Riot's proposal 41 19.43%
Freedom's proposal 26 12.32%
Bush did p99 toxicity 65 30.81%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-27-2020, 07:59 PM
feniin feniin is online now
Planar Protector

feniin's Avatar

Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,924
Default

I'd be happy with a mash up of Riot and AG's. Freedom's may as well have been written in crayon.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-27-2020, 07:59 PM
Balimon Balimon is offline
Sarnak

Balimon's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 454
Default

AG's most well written and concise, and similar in nature to Riot. Looks like a good place to start negotiating.
__________________

[ Kurrat - 55 Conjurer - < Black Lotus > ]
[ Samarhad -Warlord ] [ Behkten - Sorcerer ] [ Hensatti -57 Conjurer ]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:05 PM
Fammaden Fammaden is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 891
Default

Riot proposing a green style jury system when most shit on green bypasses it to settle out of court or petition straight to GM's.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:22 PM
kaizersoze kaizersoze is offline
Sarnak

kaizersoze's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fammaden [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Riot proposing a green style jury system when most shit on green bypasses it to settle out of court or petition straight to GM's.
Gms want less petitions and there isnt much other option lol
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:25 PM
Akg49 Akg49 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 124
Default

and Detoxx immediately asks for Rotation Races rofl. Detoxx, these aren't competitive, they exclude all the casuals (this has been shown in Kael for months), and you need to stop hiding behind them. Stop being scared to actually compete, you know, by playing actual Everquest.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:25 PM
Fammaden Fammaden is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 891
Default

Passing it off onto other players from the server to rule on seems incredibly flawed and not likely to reduce petitions. Like I said no one wants to get into some star chamber shit on green they'd rather concede or get the GM's involved, so the same status quo we already have.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:28 PM
Bardp1999 Bardp1999 is offline
Fire Giant

Bardp1999's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Maceland
Posts: 662
Default

All petitions get posted into an RnF poll and the online forum community gets to decide, problem solved
__________________
Forum Quest
Spyder73 (BANNED)
NecroP1999 (BANNED)
Frostbane Wolfeye - Green99 - 50 Shaman
Wolfeye - Green99 - 1 Warrior
Myrdrraal - WoW Classic (Herod) - 60 Shaman
#FreeWuTang
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-27-2020, 08:43 PM
Scalem Scalem is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bardp1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Where is the "leave all 3 guilds indefinitely suspended" option
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-27-2020, 09:02 PM
Akg49 Akg49 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 124
Default

Meanwhile, Freedom's toxicity is overflowing again in the UN channel, trying to keep casual guilds out, trying to lock up content behind their Rotation Races. Shame.

Focus should be on how to bring together proposals, especially with many people finding much agreement between AG and Riot's proposal right now.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-27-2020, 09:02 PM
kaizersoze kaizersoze is offline
Sarnak

kaizersoze's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fammaden [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Passing it off onto other players from the server to rule on seems incredibly flawed and not likely to reduce petitions. Like I said no one wants to get into some star chamber shit on green they'd rather concede or get the GM's involved, so the same status quo we already have.
What is your solution to reduce petitions, if not by council of our peers? The GMs, who are volunteers, are sick of dealing with them week in and week out, but if people are breaking the rules, you can't just let them crap on the server because the GMs dont want to be bothered.

The only other real solution I can think of is when a guild thinks they're wronged, everyone drops the mob, reviews, and a concession is thrown out by the guilty party or people who claimed falsely. But if the punishment is the same as if they wait weeks on end while things are reviewed, no loot is deleted, and it's only 2 mobs they lose, why even bother not going to petition? You might even get away with it even if you did break the rules.

A council might not be perfect, but it could be dealt with far more swiftly and if the party found in the wrong doesn't like it, they could escalate it, but if one party is habitually in the wrong and petitioned, people will take notice in and out of guild. Especially if there are steeper consequences to it.

As for the TOV lockouts, this is Freedom's chance to try to throw AG away like a used condom with a meta that literally only they want. Very short lockouts would be fine to prevent leapfrogging, but Freedom doesn't want that. It's gonna be a LONG winter of not raiding, folks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.