Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: do you think the current VP rules are bullshit?
yes 327 68.99%
no 147 31.01%
Voters: 474. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-04-2013, 12:15 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Exclamation Why is training allowed on p99 in veeshan's peak? (poll asking your opinion)

Ok so its been previously established that training be allowed in veeshan's peak, but why? On live training was never allowed, even in."non csr" zones like veeshans peak.


"Non csr" did not mean training was allowed. In its current state veeshans peak is broken and.favors whichever guild has the most trainers available to them, or whichever.guild has the largest numbers. This is contradictory to what eq raiding should be at this point as dragons are very trivial with anything over 25 players seeing as they are all 32k hps.


So why is training allowed in VP? was there some reason this was put into place in the past? Also, if its allowed in VP then it should be allowed in planes of hate/fear/sky as those were put in the same non-csr category as VP. Here is a link to the eq rule book: http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=97723


So do you think this rule needs to be changed to more closely resemble the classic rule set"

Should training really be allowed in VP?

And if so then by whatever logic you base that opinion off of, shouldn't training be allowed in hatr and fear as well?


Looking to keep this discussion friendly and constructive, go to RNF and make a thread if you want to troll.

Thanks.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #2  
Old 08-04-2013, 12:18 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Sry for typos, posted from cell phone and trying to edit is a bitch.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #3  
Old 08-04-2013, 12:22 AM
Motec Motec is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 684
Default

I vote no, because I am all for sharing, PNP and all that jazz.
  #4  
Old 08-04-2013, 12:25 AM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

It is allowed in Sleepers and VP
  #5  
Old 08-04-2013, 12:26 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

My opinion is if you somehow interpret "no csr" to mean anything goes, then you have to apply the same ruleset to other zones which were "no csr" on live.

Either way training was NEVER allowed on live, even in VP amd other no csr zones.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #6  
Old 08-04-2013, 12:26 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is allowed in Sleepers and VP


Wut? Everything I've read indicates otherwise. Where is your proof?
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #7  
Old 08-04-2013, 12:29 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

I personally think that racing to a vp mob while avoiding training your competition and coming out on top in a fair mobilization/fte contest is a way bigger indicator of skill than who has 20 training classes to dedicate to keeping your raid wiped being the automatic winner.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #8  
Old 08-04-2013, 01:21 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Bump cmon people this has gone on long enough.

Outlaw training as it was on live or follow through with the perversion of the rules followed on live and allow training in ALL non-csr zones listed in the everquest rule book. This includes hate/fear/sky.


I just think there has to be some kind of consistency here, is training allowed in vp because non csr allows for it? if so..then why this same thought process not taken into consideration concerning other classically non-csr zones?
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
Last edited by Tasslehofp99; 08-04-2013 at 01:23 AM..
  #9  
Old 08-04-2013, 01:36 AM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

more people would play if rules were consistent. Means more donations. which means more server hardware. which means better server. It is only beneficial. If you want to be jerks, roll red.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #10  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:06 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jameswilliams [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nothing is going to happen.

They don't give a shit.

HUNDREDS were caught cheating with the antihack DLL, and what happened? Nothing.

All of TMO were caught exploiting in VP, and what happened? Nothing.

Nihilum exploited countless raid mobs for loot, and what happened? Nothing.

The staff are incompetent faggots excluding Rogean and Nilbog. Everyone else is either a dev and can't control it, or a worthless scumbag just protecting who's on top on both servers.
No offense bud I appreciate your imput but this is the exact kind of posts I'm trying to avoid. There is real evidence as far as I'm concerned that the current rule set in VP is a perversion of the.classic rules. We should really try to call for consistency regarding rules rather than bash the staff for the current rules which are far from what went on during live.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.