Race and Class counts last night

[Gustoo]

They solo fine but not as efficiently as the high efficiency guys like shaman druid and necro and enchanter.

They are the tier below with long med times.

Good mix there!

[Jibartik]

If only only look at this page, gustoo's post is like, an exciting mystery.

What could it be?

[Solemnus]

Might not be classic, but if I ever made a server I'd give Wizards the clarity line and take it away from Enchanters. One class is way too OP and the other is way too limited in too many areas.

[Gustoo]

If wizards had clarity they would be the best class in the game and too straight forward for the game designers to allow.

1. Blow enemy away
2. Quick rest to full mana
1. Blow enemy away

I'm pretty convinced that enchanters aren't supposed to be able to charm high level dungeons the way they do here. I don't remember it being done on live, but maybe I just missed it. On this server, enchanters are OP.

[BarnabusCollins]

128 porters.

[Solemnus]

Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If wizards had clarity they would be the best class in the game and too straight forward for the game designers to allow.

1. Blow enemy away
2. Quick rest to full mana
1. Blow enemy away

I'm pretty convinced that enchanters aren't supposed to be able to charm high level dungeons the way they do here. I don't remember it being done on live, but maybe I just missed it. On this server, enchanters are OP.

Wizards can do that... if an Enchanter is nearby, which they often are. In fact having gate + ports means a Wizard can go get clarity whenever they want really. I know as a druid I often did.

Meanwhile a wizard is nearly useless in groups due to lack of utility. Clarity would give them something useful to provide. And Enchanters have so many ridiculous abilities that they would do fine without clarity. They'd still easily be one of the best classes in the game without it, which really highlights how broken they are.

[Exard3k]

Originally Posted by Solemnus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Meanwhile a wizard is nearly useless in groups due to lack of utility.

Root+Stun is pretty good utility if you ask me. And you dont have high-apm playstyle like e.g. shamans and can use those two very reliable and often.

[Tunabros]

Originally Posted by BarnabusCollins [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

128 porters.

buncha normies [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Solemnus]

Originally Posted by Exard3k [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Root+Stun is pretty good utility if you ask me. And you dont have high-apm playstyle like e.g. shamans and can use those two very reliable and often.

It's not bad, the issue with this is it's not unique to their class. Clerics can also root and stun. Druids, Rangers and Necro's can root, Mage pets can root, Bards can root and stun. Enchanters can root and stun too (they can do anything but heal basically). You wouldn't usually get a Wizard in your group because "We need him for roots and stuns."

In the trio of types - Tank, DPS and Heals - Wizard is useless at tanking, useless at Healing and actually one of the worst at DPS in most group situations, because what a group wants is consistent DPS not huge spikes followed by long breaks.

[Shourty]

I wonder how many Bone Knights are in that 29.