******Official politics thread ******

[JurisDictum]

proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg

[skarlorn]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Attachment 10287

you are better than that dude i believe in you !

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elizabeth Warren is the first to propose a high-profile long term solution to escalating counter-productive wealth inequality.



Corporate governance is the most underrated element of the modern capitalist economy. Essentially modern corporate structure is the reason America has far more wealth inequality in Europe. Shareholders and capital are completely unbound by responsibility to anything but their bottom line in the U.S..

Even that becomes unenforceable much of the time because the CEO is often the largest shareholder (or leads a constituency that is). So if there is anyway the CEO can enrich themselves at the cost of the company's bottom line, they usually get away with that. In these situations there is literally nothing but their personal wealth considerations.

Time to replace that with a "we're all in it together" approach. Which is clearly shown to work better than the neoliberal arrangement. If you want workers to give a shit about the corporations they work for, you better give them a steak in them. And if you don't want management running business into the ground for their own enrichment, you better not incentivize them to do so.

Warren is so out of touch she thought it would be wiser to be a socialist cuck (that is less than the shadow of bernie sanders) and NOT support sanders in the 2016 primary.

The thing is with socialism, you have to not pick sides. She picks sides. That means she's an authoritarian. Not a socialist.

[Bainers]

It's funny, you'd almost think the left won the last election, the house and senate from all the outrage from the right. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Bainers]

Definition of authoritarian
1 : of, relating to, or favoring blind submission to authority had authoritarian parents
2 : of, relating to, or favoring a concentration of power in a leader or an elite not constitutionally responsible to the people an authoritarian regime

Sounds a wee bit like our current "President", no?

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Bainers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's funny, you'd almost think the left won the last election, the house and senate from all the outrage from the right. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We don’t like traffic, rap music, ugly women, greasy people, dark hair, dark eyes, the obese, the poor, etc

It’s frustrating when half the population insists on diluting our superiority by importing the scum of the earth

Hope this explanation helps! Close the borders to anyone less than a C cup blonde (natural of course)

[clevergirl]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Domo]

Some people here seems to missunderstand the word socalism.

Its not about communism, its about solidarity.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by Domo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Some people here seems to missunderstand the word socalism.

Its not about communism, its about solidarity.

The Nazis thought their cause was about solidarity as well.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Domo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Some people here seems to missunderstand the word socalism.

Its not about communism, its about solidarity.

"take the wealth from those that have made it"

"take the wealth from the 1%"

whats the difference?