09-17-2021, 03:12 PM
|
Planar Protector
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,359
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooloo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Haha, nobody is complaining about teaching history. We've already been doing that for decades. What people oppose is teaching history that is bullshit, untrue and casts aspersions about groups of people based on their skin color. This is absolutely, completely self-evidently racist and you have to be blind, stupid, racist, or all three to deny it. And yes, it IS being taught, especially in colleges but it's creeping lower and lower in grade level.
Leftie defense always seems to be "no, this isn't happening, you're making things up". Meanwhile Kendi and "White fragility" is required reading in MANY undergrad and graduate programs now, and Kendi himself *identifies* as a critical race theorist. AKA untalented grifter with nothing to offer, making a living off white guilt and stirring up outrage among minorities. He *needs* people to be divided by race, and stoke animosity between races. His paycheck depends on it.
Same problem the left faces: They claim to be against racism, but they need it to exist, lest they lose their political and social identity as the good guys. Meanwhile america is better today than it has ever been for minorities, which the left should celebrate, but instead they pretend it's never been worse. It's such a transparently cynical and divisive strategy.
The USA is not terrible to minorities anymore, at all. It's not 1960, let alone 1860. BLM is completely mainstream, it is endorsed by virtually every possible institution. How does that equate to a racist society? It doesn't, and you're wrong.
|
Critical theory is rooted in post-Leninism, it isn't some new thing you're on the cutting edge of opposing it. It's been around longer than you have, zoomer.
You just slapped the word race on it to generate adviews. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
|
|
|