Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Important > News & Announcements

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-04-2010, 01:04 AM
Cowboy Cowboy is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fix'd
Actually, it is in fact me not I.

I want to thank .... for chatting with (remove Nilbog and) me.

[YES] For chatting with me.

[NO] For chatting with I.

The rule is that you come after those listed as the nouns or direct objects... and that to determine the appropriate use of I or me you remove others in the list and form the sentence with you as the only noun/D.O.

Edit: My god, the grammar nazi in me wanted to jump on this so quickly, that I hadn't caught Rogean's absolutely correct defense of his use of me and not I. Sorry for the late back-up!
Double-Edit: And with my lack of evidence other than my own personal experience with the rules of grammar, my back-up is unnecessary and trite at this stage of the thread. I may just remove it.
Followup-Edit: Nah.

Truth.
Last edited by Cowboy; 04-04-2010 at 01:21 AM..
  #22  
Old 04-04-2010, 01:14 AM
Akim Akim is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 481
Default

I didn't pass English in college.
But I passed Spanish..
And it was because of rules like these..
I speak English.!
  #23  
Old 04-04-2010, 03:57 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nial [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Published Grammar Manual

when was the last time you ever saw one?
Rules of MLA writing style or some such in English 1a, why?
__________________
  #24  
Old 04-04-2010, 02:31 PM
BuzWeaver BuzWeaver is offline
Kobold

BuzWeaver's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA USA
Posts: 189
Send a message via AIM to BuzWeaver Send a message via Yahoo to BuzWeaver
Default

Thanks to the article I finally jumped on-board. Some of my old guild mates had mentioned the EQEMU back when it first came out, however I had other things going on at the time.

The guys who put this all together have done an amazing job, no question their love for the game is shinning through and thanks to them we can enjoy the glory days. I'm really excited to learn more and will be perusing the forums here to learn a little more.
  #25  
Old 04-04-2010, 06:39 PM
Tudana Tudana is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lakeland. Fla.
Posts: 224
Default

this is great news guys, I sure hope your ready for the onslaught!
__________________
Sargon | Paraday | Borneldar
a Pickclaw Arroweater says, 'Flarglegrump ak murgledoo! That is Goblin for "I hate you!"
  #26  
Old 04-04-2010, 07:04 PM
atvaata atvaata is offline
Kobold

atvaata's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 178
Default

and i hope hes ready for the asshatish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] ITS AWESOMES
  #27  
Old 04-04-2010, 07:15 PM
Toad Toad is offline
Orc


Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 41
Default

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/myself.html - Common Errors in English Lang - 2nd Edition

Quote:
All this confusion can easily be avoided if you just remove the second party from the sentences where you feel tempted to use “myself” as an object or feel nervous about “me.” You wouldn’t say, “The IRS sent the refund check to I,” so you shouldn’t say “The IRS sent the refund check to my wife and I” either.
  #28  
Old 04-05-2010, 02:24 AM
fastboy21 fastboy21 is offline
Planar Protector

fastboy21's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,179
Default

In English, the pronoun in a prepositional phrase is ALWAYS in the accusative...
for example...
"with John and me" NEVER "with John and I"
"between you and me" NEVER "between you and I"
"I hit the ball for him to catch" NEVER "I hit the ball for he to catch"
"With John and me in charge we will succeed" NEVER "With John and I in charge we will succeed"

has nothing to do with predicate or subject in this situation...any time a pronoun is governed by a preposition (i.e. a prepositional phrase) the pronoun must be the accusative in English (object pronoun).

This is often confused by native speakers of English because we naturally say things like:
"This is HIM" when picking up the phone. We are taught by some (usually angry) adult in about 3rd grade that we are wrong for saying that and that we should say, "This is HE", which is (of course) actually correct grammar.

However, after that embarrassing lesson (which most people don't really understand) we feel unsure of ourselves whenever we say ME HIM etc....and start to substitute I and HE all over the place. This is usually wrong.

In the subject predicate of a sentence English (and a number of other languages) use the nominative form of the pronoun. The subject predicate is almost always identified with a "to be" verb in English (i.e. is, was, am, etc.)
So....
"This is he" is correct....NEVER "This is him" (((IS = TO BE VERB = SUBJECT PREDICATE)))
"He hit him" is correct....NEVER "He hit he" (((HIT = ACTION VERB = OBJECT PREDICATE= accusative pronoun)))

This concludes my free English grammar lesson...next week I will discuss the proper use of the subjunctive mood in English (a dying art which if it WERE revived would change the world)---giggle if you caught the subjunctive there.
Last edited by fastboy21; 04-05-2010 at 02:31 AM..
  #29  
Old 04-05-2010, 08:06 AM
Jify Jify is offline
Fire Giant

Jify's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 697
Send a message via MSN to Jify
Default

It's Monday, can't read the article. /cry
__________________
Abacab tells Phallax, "To be honest you're just a bunch of little bugs on my windshield that I have to wipe clean before I start cruise controlin' into phat lewtz."
  #30  
Old 04-05-2010, 08:36 AM
FatMagic FatMagic is offline
Sarnak

FatMagic's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 410
Default

Is anyone worried this could draw TOO much undue attention, and get Sony jumping down our throats? I hope this isn't the case. I hope that it's an unfounded fear! Just don't want to see this awesome server get shut down.
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.