Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-21-2021, 10:16 PM
Kaveh Kaveh is offline
Planar Protector

Kaveh's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ctesiphon
Posts: 3,493
Default Keystone XL Pipeline

The hydrocarbons will still be extracted but will now go in trucks, which is less environmentally friendly than a pipeline. Please explain why this makes sense. Use simple language, I am from flyover
  #2  
Old 01-21-2021, 10:44 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 22,217
Default

  #3  
Old 01-21-2021, 11:20 PM
Cassawary Cassawary is offline
Planar Protector

Cassawary's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,039
Default

does it bring oil from the alberta? i heard that's not worth extracting anymore
  #4  
Old 01-21-2021, 11:30 PM
imperiouskitten imperiouskitten is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: CROATOAN
Posts: 3,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaveh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The hydrocarbons will still be extracted but will now go in trucks, which is less environmentally friendly than a pipeline. Please explain why this makes sense. Use simple language, I am from flyover
because the natives get to keep their beautiful lands untouched by pipes for more casino space

i sold my keystone stonks back when Trump lost a cpl months ago [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #5  
Old 01-22-2021, 12:08 AM
FatherSioux FatherSioux is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,069
Default

More oil = more tech = less pollution

“Build more farms”
  #6  
Old 01-22-2021, 12:13 AM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 22,217
Default

I know there was some buzz that because it was from tar sands, it was not cheep enough to produce that made trucking it worth it. Maybe that's changed. Maybe that was someone tricking me? Idk!

Maybe they'll truck it now, because they already invested so much under trump and now the strat is the green faction is just going to try to hurt t the oil factions bottom line?

It was my understanding the vast majority of it was going to be shipped to foreign investments anyway, just through the american harbor instead of maybe canadian, which it will be now?

Why did they build that pipe anyway?

Anywho, Idk if the rumors about all the oil being sold off to foreign countries after it traveled through the pipe is true, or if it was just propaganad I slurped up. But that was the messaging in 2015.

So who fricken knows.

I know that the thought process behind shutting down XL as far as the far left goes was "if we make oil hard enough to produce it will give green energy a leg up" so there is some stratigic nonsense there.

And also it's another dent in the armor of big oil, and that alone is a win for the people who are at war with them.

I honestly have no clue about what is reality or fake news though.
Last edited by Jibartik; 01-22-2021 at 12:18 AM..
  #7  
Old 01-22-2021, 12:14 AM
Kaveh Kaveh is offline
Planar Protector

Kaveh's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ctesiphon
Posts: 3,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassawary [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
does it bring oil from the alberta? i heard that's not worth extracting anymore
They’re going to ship it to China. Which is worse

The margins are minimal at pre pandemic prices, but marginal still means profit. I genuinely think keystone XL was better for the environment than the alternative, and north american extraction of jydrocarbons exerts a negative price pressure on Saudi, Russian, Venezuelan, and iranian oil. I see no way in which this opposition to pipeline expansion benefits anyone, except the native Americans as big J said

But I’m genuinely curious if there’s an economic or environmental argument. I don’t think there is
  #8  
Old 01-22-2021, 12:15 AM
Kaveh Kaveh is offline
Planar Protector

Kaveh's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ctesiphon
Posts: 3,493
Default

How do I embed YouTube clips? I still haven’t figured out how to post images so make your explanation rudimentary
  #9  
Old 01-22-2021, 12:20 AM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 22,217
Default

bracket embed] (just the code after the = sign) [/embed]

I spelled bracket, but that's because if I used one, ( [ ) the text would try to embed that jiberish in between.

figuring that out was an elf topic group effort!
  #10  
Old 01-22-2021, 12:27 AM
imperiouskitten imperiouskitten is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: CROATOAN
Posts: 3,147
Default

so you copy the youtube link, it looks like this:

youtube.com/watch?v=Sy-B7X9JP4o

take everything after the =, and put it in between [embed ] [ /embed] without spaces like [embed ]Sy-B7X9JP4o[ /embed]


images you just post the whole URL http:// ---- .png in between [img ][ /img], but it HAS to be hosted on imgur.com
Last edited by imperiouskitten; 01-22-2021 at 12:29 AM..
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.